You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem: On trigger acquisitions, for some unknown reason, we could have the signal "fifo_fc_mux_cnt" on acq_fc_fifo module ending in something different than 0 at the end of a transaction.
This causes the the first sample of the next transaction to have atoms belonging to a previous transaction.
This could be detected in simulation, but our testbench was incomplete and not checking this issue properly. The testbench is comparing the output of acq_fc_fifo with the data read from DDR. So, problems arising before the acq_fc_fifo or in itself would not be detected!
Roadmap:
Fix testbench to correctly validates our module (comparing input data with the data read from DDR)
Investigate issue to why fifo_fc_mux_cnt signal ends in something different than 0 at the end of some transactions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…cnt signal error
This is related to github issue #52, in that
the fifo_fc_mux_cnt signal is different than 0, after
the transaction ends. This points to an alignment
problem in the acquisition (typically trigger acquisitions)
and subsequent transactions could be wrong (first sample
belonging to the previous transaction).
Problem: On trigger acquisitions, for some unknown reason, we could have the signal "fifo_fc_mux_cnt" on acq_fc_fifo module ending in something different than 0 at the end of a transaction.
This causes the the first sample of the next transaction to have atoms belonging to a previous transaction.
This could be detected in simulation, but our testbench was incomplete and not checking this issue properly. The testbench is comparing the output of acq_fc_fifo with the data read from DDR. So, problems arising before the acq_fc_fifo or in itself would not be detected!
Roadmap:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: