Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report Consul tags in Address.Inet metadata #590

Open
ashald opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Report Consul tags in Address.Inet metadata #590

ashald opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@ashald
Copy link
Member

ashald commented Aug 18, 2016

In Consul, for each service endpoint arbitrary tags can be applied. Although they're called tags they're more like 'labels' rather than key-value pairs.

The proposal is to report each endpoint's tags within Address.Inet metadata as some field (probably, labels) and add support for it in Namer's Thrift IDL.

This change probably won't bring any advantages for linkerd on it's own (at least, I don't see any use-cases for it) but it might be a huge advantage for namerd together with its resolve endpoint as it can be used to supply some metadata to 3rd party applications using it.

@ashald
Copy link
Member Author

ashald commented Aug 18, 2016

I'd be happy to submit a PR implementing the feature in any form. It'd be great to hear other opinions so we can decide on best approach to handle the problem.

@IssueHuntBot
Copy link

@BoostIO funded this issue with $10. See it on IssueHunt

Tim-Brooks pushed a commit to Tim-Brooks/linkerd that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2018
The existing `conduit dashboard` command supported opening the conduit
dashboard, or displaying the conduit dashboard URL, via a `url` boolean
flag.

Replace the `url` boolean flag with a `show` string flag, with three
modes:
`conduit dashboard --show conduit`: default, open conduit dashboard
`conduit dashboard --show grafana`: open grafana dashboard
`conduit dashboard --show url`: display dashboard URLs

Part of linkerd#420

Signed-off-by: Andrew Seigner <[email protected]>
@zaharidichev
Copy link
Member

I think this was fixed in #2297

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants