-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
5782640
commit c3a9434
Showing
1 changed file
with
378 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@ | ||
Metadata: | ||
Identification_Information: | ||
Citation: | ||
Citation_Information: | ||
Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
Publication_Date: 20171120 | ||
Title: NAIP Digital Ortho Photo Image | ||
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image | ||
Publication_Information: | ||
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah | ||
Publisher: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
Description: | ||
Abstract: | ||
This data set contains imagery from the National Agriculture | ||
Imagery Program (NAIP). The NAIP program is administered by | ||
USDA FSA and has been established to support two main FSA | ||
strategic goals centered on agricultural production. | ||
These are, increase stewardship of America's natural resources | ||
while enhancing the environment, and to ensure commodities | ||
are procured and distributed effectively and efficiently to | ||
increase food security. The NAIP program supports these goals by | ||
acquiring and providing ortho imagery that has been collected | ||
during the agricultural growing season in the U.S. The NAIP | ||
ortho imagery is tailored to meet FSA requirements and is a | ||
fundamental tool used to support FSA farm and conservation | ||
programs. Ortho imagery provides an effective, intuitive | ||
means of communication about farm program administration | ||
between FSA and stakeholders. | ||
New technology and innovation is identified by fostering and | ||
maintaining a relationship with vendors and government | ||
partners, and by keeping pace with the broader geospatial | ||
community. As a result of these efforts the NAIP program | ||
provides three main products: DOQQ tiles, | ||
Compressed County Mosaics (CCM), and Seamline shape files | ||
The Contract specifications for NAIP imagery have changed | ||
over time reflecting agency requirements and improving | ||
technologies. These changes include image resolution, | ||
horizontal accuracy, coverage area, and number of bands. | ||
In general, flying seasons are established by FSA and are | ||
targeted for peak crop growing conditions. The NAIP | ||
acquisition cycle is based on a minimum 3 year refresh of base | ||
ortho imagery. The tiling format of the NAIP imagery is based | ||
on a 3.75' x 3.75' quarter quadrangle with a 300 pixel buffer | ||
on all four sides. NAIP quarter quads are formatted to the UTM | ||
coordinate system using the North American Datum of 1983. | ||
NAIP imagery may contain as much as 10% cloud cover per tile. | ||
Purpose: | ||
NAIP imagery is available for distribution within 60 days | ||
of the end of a flying season and is intended to provide current | ||
information of agricultural conditions in support of USDA farm | ||
programs. For USDA Farm Service Agency, the 1 meter and 1/2 meter | ||
GSD product provides an ortho image base for Common Land Unit | ||
boundaries and other data sets. The 1 meter and 1/2 meter NAIP | ||
imagery is generally acquired in projects covering full states in | ||
cooperation with state government and other federal agencies that | ||
use the imagery for a variety of purposes including land use | ||
planning and natural resource assessment. The NAIP is also used | ||
for disaster response. While suitable for a variety of uses, | ||
prior to 2007 the 2 meter GSD NAIP imagery was primarily intended | ||
to assess "crop condition and compliance" to USDA farm program | ||
conditions. The 2 meter imagery was generally acquired only | ||
for agricultural areas within state projects. | ||
Time_Period_of_Content: | ||
Time_Period_Information: | ||
Single_Date/Time: | ||
Calendar_Date: 20170709 | ||
Currentness_Reference: Ground Condition | ||
Status: | ||
Progress: Complete | ||
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: Irregular | ||
Spatial_Domain: | ||
Bounding_Coordinates: | ||
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.8125 | ||
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.7500 | ||
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.3125 | ||
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.2500 | ||
Keywords: | ||
Theme: | ||
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None | ||
Theme_Keyword: farming | ||
Theme_Keyword: Digital Ortho rectified Image | ||
Theme_Keyword: Ortho Rectification | ||
Theme_Keyword: Quarter Quadrangle | ||
Theme_Keyword: NAIP | ||
Theme_Keyword: Aerial Compliance | ||
Theme_Keyword: Compliance | ||
Place: | ||
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: Geographic Names Information System | ||
Place_Keyword: IA | ||
Place_Keyword: Cass | ||
Place_Keyword: 19029 | ||
Place_Keyword: IA029 | ||
Place_Keyword: CASS CO IA FSA | ||
Place_Keyword: 4109442 | ||
Place_Keyword: MASSENA, SE | ||
Place_Keyword: MASSENA | ||
Access_Constraints: There are no limitations for access. | ||
Use_Constraints: | ||
None. The USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field office | ||
asks to be credited in derived products. | ||
Point_of_Contact: | ||
Contact_Information: | ||
Contact_Organization_Primary: | ||
Contact_Organization: Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) | ||
Contact_Address: | ||
Address_Type: mailing and physical address | ||
Address: 2222 West 2300 South | ||
City: Salt Lake City | ||
State_or_Province: Utah | ||
Postal_Code: 84119-2020 | ||
Country: USA | ||
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922 | ||
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 801-956-3653 | ||
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: [email protected] | ||
Browse_Graphic: | ||
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: None | ||
Browse_Graphic_File_Description: None | ||
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: None | ||
Native_Data_Set_Environment: Unknown | ||
Data_Quality_Information: | ||
Logical_Consistency_Report: | ||
NAIP 3.75 minute tile file names are based | ||
on the USGS quadrangle naming convention. | ||
Completeness_Report: None | ||
Positional_Accuracy: | ||
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy: | ||
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: | ||
NAIP horizontal accuracy specifications have evolved over | ||
the life of the program. From 2003 to 2004 the | ||
specifications were as follows: 1-meter GSD imagery was | ||
to match within 3-meters, and 2-meter GSD to match within 10 | ||
meters of reference imagery. For 2005 the 1-meter GSD | ||
specification was changed to 5 meters matching the reference | ||
imagery. In 2006 a pilot project was performed using true | ||
ground specifications rather than reference imagery. All | ||
states used the same specifications as 2005 except Utah, | ||
which required a match of +/- 6 meters to true ground. | ||
In 2007 all specifications were the same as 2006 except | ||
Arizona used true ground specifications and all other states | ||
used reference imagery. In 2008 and subsequent years | ||
no 2-meter GSD imagery was acquired and all specifications | ||
were the same as 2007 except approximately half of the | ||
states acquired used true ground specifications and the | ||
other half used reference imagery. The 2008 states that | ||
used absolute ground control where; Indiana, Minnesota, | ||
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Texas, Vermont, and Virginia. | ||
From 2009 to present all NAIP imagery acquisitions used | ||
the +/- 6 meters to ground specification. | ||
Lineage: | ||
Source_Information: | ||
Source_Citation: | ||
Citation_Information: | ||
Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
Publication_Date: 20171120 | ||
Title: MASSENA, SE | ||
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image | ||
Type_of_Source_Media: UnKnown | ||
Source_Time_Period_of_Content: | ||
Time_Period_Information: | ||
Single_Date/Time: | ||
Calendar_Date: 20170709 | ||
Source_Currentness_Reference: | ||
Aerial Photography Date for aerial photo source. | ||
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Georectifed Image | ||
Source_Contribution: Digital Georectifed Image. | ||
|
||
Process_Step: | ||
Process_Description: | ||
Flight planning was performed in Leica MissionPro over a | ||
buffered boundary covering DOQQ extents provided by the | ||
USDA. A 500m reduced resolution DEM file was used to | ||
determine ground heights. A targeted flight altitude of | ||
approximately 16,000 feet above ground level for | ||
acquisition with sidelap of 27% was used for flight | ||
planning parameters. Five Cessna Conquests and a Cessna | ||
414 were utilized for acquisition, the seamline | ||
shapefile clarifies which aircraft were used for a given | ||
area. All aircraft were equipped with Leica ADS100 | ||
systems for data capture. The Leica ADS100 pushbroom | ||
sensor has been calibrated by the manufacturer as well | ||
as validated against a local calibration range. | ||
The calibration includes measuring the radiometric and | ||
geometric properties of the camera. These data are | ||
used in the Post Processing Software | ||
to eliminate the radiometric and geometric distortion. | ||
All aerial imagery was collected with associated GPS/IMU | ||
data. ADS collection requires high quality IMU data for | ||
processing and was critical for early access hosting of | ||
digital data to the web for USDA interim access and | ||
review. After post processing was complete, all | ||
imagery was triangulated using Leica XPro in which | ||
the airborne GPS data was constrained to expected limits. | ||
To validate the accuracy of the block adjustment derived | ||
from GPS/IMU, sensor parameters and conjugate point | ||
measurements, photo identifiable ground control points | ||
were field surveyed within each State. These points were | ||
surveyed using GPS techniques to produce coordinates | ||
that are accurate to +/- 0.25 meters RMSE in XYZ. | ||
The GPS surveying techniques utilized assured that the | ||
coordinates are derived in the required project datum | ||
and relative to an approved | ||
National Reference System. If the block does not fit the | ||
control points within specifications the pass and tie | ||
points were reviewed for blunders and weak areas. If, | ||
after these corrections were made, the block still | ||
does not fit the control well the GPS and IMU processing | ||
were reviewed. Once the block has proper statistics and | ||
fits the control to specifications, the final bundle | ||
adjustment was made. As AT points are frequently on | ||
man-made and other vertical features not included in | ||
the DEM, these ortho points can only be used to | ||
indicate regions of error by the clusters of points | ||
that predict excessive horizontal displacement. | ||
The final adjustments assure a high quality relative | ||
adjustment and a high quality absolute adjustment | ||
limited to the airborne GPS data accuracy. This process | ||
assures the final absolute accuracy of all geopositioned | ||
imagery. Both signalized and photo identified | ||
ground control were used to QC and control the IMU/GPS | ||
based aerial triangulation bundle block solution. Surdex | ||
Grouping Tool provides real-time updates | ||
of the USDA APFO Image Metrics. The image technician | ||
adjusts image correction parameters to bring the | ||
radiometric characteristics of large groups of images | ||
within the Image Metrics ranges. For each | ||
project area the highest resolution DEM or LiDAR was | ||
obtained and utilized for rectification of captured | ||
imagery. A visual inspection of the final DEM using | ||
color cycled classification by elevation and a shaded | ||
relief was performed to check for gaps, corruption | ||
and gross errors. The predicted horizontal error for | ||
each point was added as an attribute in the SURDEX | ||
enterprise database. An operator reviews ortho seams | ||
in areas these predicted errors indicate horizontal | ||
error in excess of the contract specifications. | ||
Any imagery errors introduced by source DEM required | ||
patching from an alternate perspective or strip of | ||
photography. Processing hardware used included various | ||
brands of survey grade GPS receivers, various brands | ||
and models of computers, calibrated monitors and | ||
various brands of monitor calibration colorimeters. | ||
Leica XPro was used for post | ||
processing of ADS pushbroom data, triangulation and | ||
orthorectification. SURDEX software was used to color | ||
correct and remove bidirectional reflectance, | ||
vignetting and other illumination trends. | ||
USDA APFO Image Metrics are measured and | ||
images corrected to conform to the Image Metrics using | ||
SURDEX software. GPS/IMU data was reduced to projected | ||
coordinates in the appropriate UTM zone using | ||
Inertial Explorer software from Novatel. Aerial | ||
Triangulation and orthorectification was performed | ||
using Leica XPro. SURDEX software was used to | ||
adjust for minor radiometric variation between adjacent | ||
images. SURDEX software was used to calculate the | ||
optimal seam path, check seam topology and | ||
create master tiles. SURDEX ortho software generates | ||
occlusion/smear polygons used during seam review | ||
of steep terrain. SURDEX software was used to | ||
visually inspect master tiles for seam and image | ||
defects. SURDEX software was used to project and | ||
cut final DOQQ image files from masters. | ||
SURDEX software was used to create CCM | ||
metadata. Lizardtech GeoExpress version 9.1.0.3981 | ||
was used to create the CCM image file. SURDEX software | ||
was used to perform final formatting, QC and naming | ||
of the DOQQ. USGS metadata parser software was used | ||
to validate the metadata. | ||
Various versions of Microsoft Windows were used in all | ||
phases of production. Grouping Tool was used again | ||
after DOQQ and CCM production to provide a | ||
quality assurance check. Individual DOQQ and CCM may | ||
not meet the USDA APFO Image Metrics ranges | ||
due to land cover. The goal is to have the state as a | ||
whole meet the Image Metrics. All products are reviewed | ||
by independent personnel prior to delivery. | ||
The delivery is checked for omissions, commissions, | ||
naming, formatting, specification compliance and data integrity | ||
Process_Date: 20171120 | ||
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information: | ||
Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Cass County, IA | ||
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster | ||
Raster_Object_Information: | ||
Raster_Object_Type: Pixel | ||
Row_Count: 1 | ||
Column_Count: 1 | ||
Spatial_Reference_Information: | ||
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition: | ||
Planar: | ||
Grid_Coordinate_System: | ||
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator | ||
Universal_Transverse_Mercator: | ||
UTM_Zone_Number: 15 | ||
Transverse_Mercator: | ||
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996 | ||
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -93.0 | ||
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0 | ||
False_Easting: 500000 | ||
False_Northing: 0.0 | ||
Planar_Coordinate_Information: | ||
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column | ||
Coordinate_Representation: | ||
Abscissa_Resolution: 1 | ||
Ordinate_Resolution: 1 | ||
Planar_Distance_Units: meters | ||
Geodetic_Model: | ||
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 | ||
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80 (GRS 80) | ||
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137 | ||
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257 | ||
Entity_and_Attribute_Information: | ||
Overview_Description: | ||
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview: | ||
32-bit pixels, 4 band color(RGBIR) values 0 - 255 | ||
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: None | ||
Distribution_Information: | ||
Distributor: | ||
Contact_Information: | ||
Contact_Person_Primary: | ||
Contact_Person: Supervisor Customer Services Section | ||
Contact_Organization: | ||
USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
Contact_Address: | ||
Address_Type: mailing and physical address | ||
Address: 2222 West 2300 South | ||
City: Salt Lake City | ||
State_or_Province: Utah | ||
Postal_Code: 84119-2020 | ||
Country: USA | ||
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922 | ||
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 801-956-3653 | ||
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: [email protected] | ||
Distribution_Liability: | ||
In no event shall the creators, custodians, or distributors | ||
of this information be liable for any damages arising out | ||
of its use (or the inability to use it). | ||
Standard_Order_Process: | ||
Digital_Form: | ||
Digital_Transfer_Information: | ||
Format_Name: GeoTIFF - Georeferenced Tagged Image File Format | ||
Format_Information_Content: Multispectral 4-band | ||
Digital_Transfer_Option: | ||
Offline_Option: | ||
Offline_Media: CD-ROM | ||
Recording_Format: ISO 9660 Mode 1 Level 2 Extensions | ||
Offline_Option: | ||
Offline_Media: DVD-R | ||
Recording_Format: ISO 9660 | ||
Offline_Option: | ||
Offline_Media: USB Hard Disk | ||
Recording_Format: NTFS | ||
Offline_Option: | ||
Offline_Media: FireWire Hard Disk | ||
Recording_Format: NTFS | ||
Fees: | ||
Contact the Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
for more information | ||
Resource_Description: | ||
m_4109442_se_15_1_20170709_20171026.tif | ||
Metadata_Reference_Information: | ||
Metadata_Date: 20171120 | ||
Metadata_Contact: | ||
Contact_Information: | ||
Contact_Organization_Primary: | ||
Contact_Organization: | ||
USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office | ||
Contact_Address: | ||
Address_Type: mailing and physical address | ||
Address: 2222 West 2300 South | ||
City: Salt Lake City | ||
State_or_Province: Utah | ||
Postal_Code: 84119-2020 | ||
Country: USA | ||
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922 | ||
Metadata_Standard_Name: | ||
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata | ||
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998 | ||
|
||
|