Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
add data file
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
lbborkowski authored Jun 19, 2019
1 parent 5782640 commit c3a9434
Showing 1 changed file with 378 additions and 0 deletions.
378 changes: 378 additions & 0 deletions images/samples/orig/m_4109442_se_15_1_20170709.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
Metadata:
Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office
Publication_Date: 20171120
Title: NAIP Digital Ortho Photo Image
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office
Description:
Abstract:
This data set contains imagery from the National Agriculture
Imagery Program (NAIP). The NAIP program is administered by
USDA FSA and has been established to support two main FSA
strategic goals centered on agricultural production.
These are, increase stewardship of America's natural resources
while enhancing the environment, and to ensure commodities
are procured and distributed effectively and efficiently to
increase food security. The NAIP program supports these goals by
acquiring and providing ortho imagery that has been collected
during the agricultural growing season in the U.S. The NAIP
ortho imagery is tailored to meet FSA requirements and is a
fundamental tool used to support FSA farm and conservation
programs. Ortho imagery provides an effective, intuitive
means of communication about farm program administration
between FSA and stakeholders.
New technology and innovation is identified by fostering and
maintaining a relationship with vendors and government
partners, and by keeping pace with the broader geospatial
community. As a result of these efforts the NAIP program
provides three main products: DOQQ tiles,
Compressed County Mosaics (CCM), and Seamline shape files
The Contract specifications for NAIP imagery have changed
over time reflecting agency requirements and improving
technologies. These changes include image resolution,
horizontal accuracy, coverage area, and number of bands.
In general, flying seasons are established by FSA and are
targeted for peak crop growing conditions. The NAIP
acquisition cycle is based on a minimum 3 year refresh of base
ortho imagery. The tiling format of the NAIP imagery is based
on a 3.75' x 3.75' quarter quadrangle with a 300 pixel buffer
on all four sides. NAIP quarter quads are formatted to the UTM
coordinate system using the North American Datum of 1983.
NAIP imagery may contain as much as 10% cloud cover per tile.
Purpose:
NAIP imagery is available for distribution within 60 days
of the end of a flying season and is intended to provide current
information of agricultural conditions in support of USDA farm
programs. For USDA Farm Service Agency, the 1 meter and 1/2 meter
GSD product provides an ortho image base for Common Land Unit
boundaries and other data sets. The 1 meter and 1/2 meter NAIP
imagery is generally acquired in projects covering full states in
cooperation with state government and other federal agencies that
use the imagery for a variety of purposes including land use
planning and natural resource assessment. The NAIP is also used
for disaster response. While suitable for a variety of uses,
prior to 2007 the 2 meter GSD NAIP imagery was primarily intended
to assess "crop condition and compliance" to USDA farm program
conditions. The 2 meter imagery was generally acquired only
for agricultural areas within state projects.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20170709
Currentness_Reference: Ground Condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: Irregular
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.8125
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.7500
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.3125
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.2500
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: farming
Theme_Keyword: Digital Ortho rectified Image
Theme_Keyword: Ortho Rectification
Theme_Keyword: Quarter Quadrangle
Theme_Keyword: NAIP
Theme_Keyword: Aerial Compliance
Theme_Keyword: Compliance
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: Geographic Names Information System
Place_Keyword: IA
Place_Keyword: Cass
Place_Keyword: 19029
Place_Keyword: IA029
Place_Keyword: CASS CO IA FSA
Place_Keyword: 4109442
Place_Keyword: MASSENA, SE
Place_Keyword: MASSENA
Access_Constraints: There are no limitations for access.
Use_Constraints:
None. The USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field office
asks to be credited in derived products.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO)
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 2222 West 2300 South
City: Salt Lake City
State_or_Province: Utah
Postal_Code: 84119-2020
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 801-956-3653
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: [email protected]
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: None
Browse_Graphic_File_Description: None
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: None
Native_Data_Set_Environment: Unknown
Data_Quality_Information:
Logical_Consistency_Report:
NAIP 3.75 minute tile file names are based
on the USGS quadrangle naming convention.
Completeness_Report: None
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
NAIP horizontal accuracy specifications have evolved over
the life of the program. From 2003 to 2004 the
specifications were as follows: 1-meter GSD imagery was
to match within 3-meters, and 2-meter GSD to match within 10
meters of reference imagery. For 2005 the 1-meter GSD
specification was changed to 5 meters matching the reference
imagery. In 2006 a pilot project was performed using true
ground specifications rather than reference imagery. All
states used the same specifications as 2005 except Utah,
which required a match of +/- 6 meters to true ground.
In 2007 all specifications were the same as 2006 except
Arizona used true ground specifications and all other states
used reference imagery. In 2008 and subsequent years
no 2-meter GSD imagery was acquired and all specifications
were the same as 2007 except approximately half of the
states acquired used true ground specifications and the
other half used reference imagery. The 2008 states that
used absolute ground control where; Indiana, Minnesota,
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Texas, Vermont, and Virginia.
From 2009 to present all NAIP imagery acquisitions used
the +/- 6 meters to ground specification.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office
Publication_Date: 20171120
Title: MASSENA, SE
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Type_of_Source_Media: UnKnown
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20170709
Source_Currentness_Reference:
Aerial Photography Date for aerial photo source.
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Georectifed Image
Source_Contribution: Digital Georectifed Image.

Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Flight planning was performed in Leica MissionPro over a
buffered boundary covering DOQQ extents provided by the
USDA. A 500m reduced resolution DEM file was used to
determine ground heights. A targeted flight altitude of
approximately 16,000 feet above ground level for
acquisition with sidelap of 27% was used for flight
planning parameters. Five Cessna Conquests and a Cessna
414 were utilized for acquisition, the seamline
shapefile clarifies which aircraft were used for a given
area. All aircraft were equipped with Leica ADS100
systems for data capture. The Leica ADS100 pushbroom
sensor has been calibrated by the manufacturer as well
as validated against a local calibration range.
The calibration includes measuring the radiometric and
geometric properties of the camera. These data are
used in the Post Processing Software
to eliminate the radiometric and geometric distortion.
All aerial imagery was collected with associated GPS/IMU
data. ADS collection requires high quality IMU data for
processing and was critical for early access hosting of
digital data to the web for USDA interim access and
review. After post processing was complete, all
imagery was triangulated using Leica XPro in which
the airborne GPS data was constrained to expected limits.
To validate the accuracy of the block adjustment derived
from GPS/IMU, sensor parameters and conjugate point
measurements, photo identifiable ground control points
were field surveyed within each State. These points were
surveyed using GPS techniques to produce coordinates
that are accurate to +/- 0.25 meters RMSE in XYZ.
The GPS surveying techniques utilized assured that the
coordinates are derived in the required project datum
and relative to an approved
National Reference System. If the block does not fit the
control points within specifications the pass and tie
points were reviewed for blunders and weak areas. If,
after these corrections were made, the block still
does not fit the control well the GPS and IMU processing
were reviewed. Once the block has proper statistics and
fits the control to specifications, the final bundle
adjustment was made. As AT points are frequently on
man-made and other vertical features not included in
the DEM, these ortho points can only be used to
indicate regions of error by the clusters of points
that predict excessive horizontal displacement.
The final adjustments assure a high quality relative
adjustment and a high quality absolute adjustment
limited to the airborne GPS data accuracy. This process
assures the final absolute accuracy of all geopositioned
imagery. Both signalized and photo identified
ground control were used to QC and control the IMU/GPS
based aerial triangulation bundle block solution. Surdex
Grouping Tool provides real-time updates
of the USDA APFO Image Metrics. The image technician
adjusts image correction parameters to bring the
radiometric characteristics of large groups of images
within the Image Metrics ranges. For each
project area the highest resolution DEM or LiDAR was
obtained and utilized for rectification of captured
imagery. A visual inspection of the final DEM using
color cycled classification by elevation and a shaded
relief was performed to check for gaps, corruption
and gross errors. The predicted horizontal error for
each point was added as an attribute in the SURDEX
enterprise database. An operator reviews ortho seams
in areas these predicted errors indicate horizontal
error in excess of the contract specifications.
Any imagery errors introduced by source DEM required
patching from an alternate perspective or strip of
photography. Processing hardware used included various
brands of survey grade GPS receivers, various brands
and models of computers, calibrated monitors and
various brands of monitor calibration colorimeters.
Leica XPro was used for post
processing of ADS pushbroom data, triangulation and
orthorectification. SURDEX software was used to color
correct and remove bidirectional reflectance,
vignetting and other illumination trends.
USDA APFO Image Metrics are measured and
images corrected to conform to the Image Metrics using
SURDEX software. GPS/IMU data was reduced to projected
coordinates in the appropriate UTM zone using
Inertial Explorer software from Novatel. Aerial
Triangulation and orthorectification was performed
using Leica XPro. SURDEX software was used to
adjust for minor radiometric variation between adjacent
images. SURDEX software was used to calculate the
optimal seam path, check seam topology and
create master tiles. SURDEX ortho software generates
occlusion/smear polygons used during seam review
of steep terrain. SURDEX software was used to
visually inspect master tiles for seam and image
defects. SURDEX software was used to project and
cut final DOQQ image files from masters.
SURDEX software was used to create CCM
metadata. Lizardtech GeoExpress version 9.1.0.3981
was used to create the CCM image file. SURDEX software
was used to perform final formatting, QC and naming
of the DOQQ. USGS metadata parser software was used
to validate the metadata.
Various versions of Microsoft Windows were used in all
phases of production. Grouping Tool was used again
after DOQQ and CCM production to provide a
quality assurance check. Individual DOQQ and CCM may
not meet the USDA APFO Image Metrics ranges
due to land cover. The goal is to have the state as a
whole meet the Image Metrics. All products are reviewed
by independent personnel prior to delivery.
The delivery is checked for omissions, commissions,
naming, formatting, specification compliance and data integrity
Process_Date: 20171120
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Cass County, IA
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Pixel
Row_Count: 1
Column_Count: 1
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 15
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -93.0
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
False_Easting: 500000
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 1
Ordinate_Resolution: 1
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80 (GRS 80)
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
32-bit pixels, 4 band color(RGBIR) values 0 - 255
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: None
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Supervisor Customer Services Section
Contact_Organization:
USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 2222 West 2300 South
City: Salt Lake City
State_or_Province: Utah
Postal_Code: 84119-2020
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 801-956-3653
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: [email protected]
Distribution_Liability:
In no event shall the creators, custodians, or distributors
of this information be liable for any damages arising out
of its use (or the inability to use it).
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: GeoTIFF - Georeferenced Tagged Image File Format
Format_Information_Content: Multispectral 4-band
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: CD-ROM
Recording_Format: ISO 9660 Mode 1 Level 2 Extensions
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: DVD-R
Recording_Format: ISO 9660
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: USB Hard Disk
Recording_Format: NTFS
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: FireWire Hard Disk
Recording_Format: NTFS
Fees:
Contact the Aerial Photography Field Office
for more information
Resource_Description:
m_4109442_se_15_1_20170709_20171026.tif
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20171120
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 2222 West 2300 South
City: Salt Lake City
State_or_Province: Utah
Postal_Code: 84119-2020
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-844-2922
Metadata_Standard_Name:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c3a9434

Please sign in to comment.