-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing definitions in unicode-math-table.tex #371
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Keep mathtool’s definition, save ours as `\Uoverbracket` and `\Uunderbracket` and issue a warning, closes #215.
For the sake of unimath-symbols.ltx file, we already define them manually in the package.
Set bold math version, if the math font has a bold variant it will be used, else LaTeX will fallback to normal font, but now gives LaTeX font warnings since almost all fonts lack a bold variant, not sure how to suppress it. fixes #229 and fixes 230
Most fonts are missing it, but that is life.
Doesn’t have many of font specific issues in #155.
Remove one using neo euler; I don't think it's very helpful to have multiple tests that vary only by font -- I might trim down some more later. Also still need to get around to renaming the tests so they're logically named, but that can happen slowly.
This is hard to spot as it's a csname!
One stray \luatexUmath... removed
Add over left and right harpoon for consistency
Add U+1EEF0 and U+1EEF1 math operator
still hopefully the sans glyphs will be added to unicode, but in the mean time this raises an error! something to be addressed but best left unsaid for now. closes #355
Update to use \sys_if_engine... tests
closes #372
closes #375
no more `vargreek-shape` package option!
closes #347
closes #350
Hi Bruno — very sorry for the slow reply to this! The end of last year was a bit mad for us… No need to apologise about the pull request … I haven't been very good at keeping track of branches and so on. For the time being all of the development has been happening in the |
Hi Will,
No need to be sorry at all: I already cannot imagine how you are managing to keep your considerable involvement in the LaTeX 3 project given your duties as a newly appointed lecturer (if I understood correctly). So fontspec and unicode-math on top of all that, that seems out of this world!
Actually I had noticed now and then your modifications to fontspec and unicode-math (via github notifications). Keep up the good work!
All the best,
Bruno
… Le 28 janv. 2017 à 13:20, Will Robertson ***@***.***> a écrit :
Hi Bruno — very sorry for the slow reply to this! The end of last year was a bit mad for us… No need to apologise about the pull request … I haven't been very good at keeping track of branches and so on. For the time being all of the development has been happening in the master branch. I've recently added \mathsection and \mathparagraph; I'll add \surd shortly.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#371 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWAQDy1skir4nsCUcgxO3HRmw7qykNV8ks5rWzKjgaJpZM4Kg5wD>.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The following three definitions are missing
\UnicodeMathSymbol{"0221A}{\surd }{\mathord}{radical}%
\UnicodeMathSymbol{"000A7}{\mathsection }{\mathord}{section sign}%
\UnicodeMathSymbol{"000B6}{\mathparagraph }{\mathord}{pilcrow sign}%
The first one is the radical character (a bit old-style, used individually not as part of the \sqrt construct), the next two are used in \fnsymbol for footnotes.
Also, it would be nice if there were a command \DeclareUnicodeMathSymbol available for the user to use in a .tex file, similar to fontspec's \DeclareUnicodeSymbol from tuenc.def.
Sorry if this is not the way a pull request is supposed to be, this is my first experience with GitHub.