Fix for multi-level xml tags (lvl 3+)

[BigOHenry]

EXAMPLE XML:

<StepProcess>
		<StepName>FKZ</StepName>
		<Result>NEAKCEPTOVANO</Result>
		<ErrorsProcess>
			<ErrorItem>
				<DataArea>PERF30_11</DataArea>
				<DynPar>T0019:1,R0109:315700MJRNJSVB95U852,R0106:K#U\FB*Hr.`022Fi_Z::CzvCa,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X</DynPar>
				<StatusItem>ODMITNUTO</StatusItem>
				<Error>
					<Code>SDAT_2059</Code>
					<Severity>Zavazna</Severity>
					<Text>Je-li záznam zaslán s parametrem T0025=X, musí existovat platný záznam se stejným číselníkovým klíčem.</Text>
					<Localization>
						<DataAreaCode>PERF30_11</DataAreaCode>
						<Detail>
							<DynPar>T0019:1,R0109:315700MJRNJSVB95U852,R0106:K#U\FB*Hr.`022Fi_Z::CzvCa,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X</DynPar>
						</Detail>
					</Localization>
				</Error>
			</ErrorItem>
			<ErrorItem>
				<DataArea>PERF30_11</DataArea>
				<DynPar>T0019:2,R0109:IYKCAVNFR8QGF00HV840,R0106:Q-QY?6W'G?t(X!Q6kG)%h58uo'dW,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X</DynPar>
				<StatusItem>ODMITNUTO</StatusItem>
				<Error>
					<Code>SDAT_2059</Code>
					<Severity>Zavazna</Severity>
					<Text>Je-li záznam zaslán s parametrem T0025=X, musí existovat platný záznam se stejným číselníkovým klíčem.</Text>
					<Localization>
						<DataAreaCode>PERF30_11</DataAreaCode>
						<Detail>
							<DynPar>T0019:2,R0109:IYKCAVNFR8QGF00HV840,R0106:Q-QY?6W'G?t(X!Q6kG)%h58uo'dW,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X</DynPar>
						</Detail>
					</Localization>
				</Error>
			</ErrorItem>
		</ErrorsProcess>
	</StepProcess>
<StepProcess>

Without this fix:
Case 1:

• parseString: 'ProcessErrors[ErrorItem{DataArea,DynPar,StatusItem,Error{Code,Severity,Text}}]
• result: Working, everything is parsed to array

Case 2:

• parseString: 'ProcessErrors[ErrorItem{DataArea,DynPar,StatusItem,Error{Code,Severity,Text,Localization{DataAreaCode,Detail.DynPar}}}]

• result: NOT ok, whole part Error skipped

'errors_trn' => array (1)
   |  0 => array (1)
   |  |  'Error{Code,Severity,Text,Localization{DataAreaCode,Detail.DynPar}}}' => array (2)
   |  |  |  0 => array (3)
   |  |  |  |  'DataArea' => 'PERF30_11'
   |  |  |  |  'DynPar' => 'T0019:1,R0109:315700MJRNJSVB95U852,R0106:K#U\FB*Hr.`022Fi_Z::CzvCa,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X'
   |  |  |  |  'StatusItem' => 'ODMITNUTO'
   |  |  |  1 => array (3)
   |  |  |  |  'DataArea' => 'PERF30_11'
   |  |  |  |  'DynPar' => 'T0019:2,R0109:IYKCAVNFR8QGF00HV840,R0106:Q-QY?6W'G?t(X!Q6kG)%h58uo'dW,R0108:,R0107:,T0025:X'
   |  |  |  |  'StatusItem' => 'ODMITNUTO'

With this fix, case 2 is now working

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 95.062% when pulling dc8ffc1 on BigOHenry:master into cac6349 on laravie:master.

[crynobone]

Can you submit tests covering this usage?

[BigOHenry]

Now should be ok

[BigOHenry]

finally :)

[BigOHenry]

When you have a plan the merge? Thank you

[heavensloop]

I had to abandon this package and write my own parser because this feature hasn't been merged

[BigOHenry]

Hey, i dont wanna be rude, but is there any motivation to accept this pull request?

[crynobone]

I am still fully occupied with my day job at the moment.