-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moving kfserving to 0.2.2 #631
Conversation
/assign @johnugeorge cc @jlewi @ellis-bigelow |
I think there are other changes like logger in the crd not just version bump, we need a better way to sync manifests in kfserving to here. |
@yuzisun is the CRD pulled from kfserving to here? Or manually crafted? |
You can not pull from config there because it does some patch later on with kustomize. Unfortunately for now you need to manually pull the final crd out from the 0.2.2 release yaml(https://github.com/kubeflow/kfserving/blob/master/install/0.2.2/kfserving.yaml), we need a script to automate this process, manual update here is a bit error prone. |
@animeshsingh most importantly we need to add the namespace selector environment variable on kfserving controller statefulset manifest @hougangliu introduced :) |
Ok - seems the tests are looking good now + accounted for namespace label selector change. |
awesome! looks good now! |
@krishnadurai or @kkasravi this one will need attention |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Just a minor comment.
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ spec: | |||
fieldPath: metadata.namespace | |||
- name: SECRET_NAME | |||
value: kfserving-webhook-server-secret | |||
image: $(registry)/kfserving-controller:0.2.0 | |||
- name: ENABLE_WEBHOOK_NAMESPACE_SELECTOR | |||
value: enabled |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want this value to be configured by KfDef?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah - enables kfserving deployment in kubeflow to be independent of standalone kfserving behaviour
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with kubeflow installation I think this should be always be on otherwise user is taking a risk. Once we migrate to object selector with kuberentes 1.15+ then this env can be retired.
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: animeshsingh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Moves kfserving to 0.2.2
This change is![Reviewable](https://camo.githubusercontent.com/23b05f5fb48215c989e92cc44cf6512512d083132bd3daf689867c8d9d386888/68747470733a2f2f72657669657761626c652e696f2f7265766965775f627574746f6e2e737667)