Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed typo. #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2023
Merged

Fixed typo. #12

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

wadetregaskis
Copy link

No description provided.

@ktoso ktoso merged commit 4a6e0a5 into ktoso:wip-task-executors Nov 1, 2023
ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
* Initial revision of task executors proposal

* Cleanup and remove unclear pieces of design

* add missing withTaskExecutor in snippet

* Update NNNN-task-executor-preference.md

* remove ordering promises; they are not strictly guaranteed

* preference also affects default actors

* introduce the notion of TaskExecutor, in order to handle default actors

* change title

* add some warnings about when to use this proposal

* arrow typo in diagram

* Fix typo (#11)

Fixed a little typo

* Fixed typo. (#12)

* Update missed section; SerialExecutors are NOT TaskExecutors by default

* Explain Task(on actor) a bit more -- in future directions

* fix typo in async let example

* add unownedTaskExecutor API

* minor rewording in sentence

* document that executor can be both serial and task executor

* add minor notes to serial+task executor section

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Doug Gregor <[email protected]>

* Update NNNN-task-executor-preference.md

* Cleanup a comment

* Update proposals/NNNN-task-executor-preference.md

Co-authored-by: John McCall <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Genaro-Chris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wade Tregaskis <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Doug Gregor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: John McCall <[email protected]>
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants