Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rekt] Channel Delivery Spec data plane tests. #5279

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 20, 2021

Conversation

n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

@n3wscott n3wscott commented Apr 19, 2021

Adding similar tests to broker delivery spec tests to use a topology helper, with a estimator and then a comparator for what really happened.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 19, 2021
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Apr 19, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 19, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #5279 (fb32b4d) into main (60bc1cf) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5279      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.63%   83.65%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         243      243              
  Lines        6879     6891      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         5753     5765      +12     
  Misses        783      783              
  Partials      343      343              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/eventfilter/attributes/filter.go 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60bc1cf...fb32b4d. Read the comment docs.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 19, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 20, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 20, 2021
@n3wscott n3wscott changed the title [Rekt] Apply topology idea to channel data plane tests. [Rekt] Channel Delivery Spec data plane tests. Apr 20, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 20, 2021
@n3wscott n3wscott marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2021 22:04
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 20, 2021
@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @vaikas

Copy link
Contributor

@vaikas vaikas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
we can combine the checkers in a followup.

return 1
}

func assertExpectedEvents(prober *eventshub.EventProber, expected map[string]eventPattern) feature.StepFn {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can reconcile these with the broker ones in a followup.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 20, 2021
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vaikas

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 20, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 73ce225 into knative:main Apr 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants