Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Increase resource requests on Prow jobs but only run if code changed #3029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

embik
Copy link
Member

@embik embik commented Oct 16, 2023

Summary

This PR increases the memory and cpu requests on Prow jobs for e2e tests to ensure that they get their own nodes with minimal interference. At the same time, it adds run_if_changed to ensure that we no longer run e2e tests on non-code changes.

In addition, I'm reducing the number of runs in pull-kcp-test-e2e-multiple-runs from 3 to 2. That should be "good enough" while reducing the runtime of the job by one third.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

Release Notes

NONE

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 16, 2023
@embik embik changed the title WIP: 🌱 Increase memory requests on Prow jobs but only run if code changed WIP: 🌱 Increase resource requests on Prow jobs but only run if code changed Oct 16, 2023
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 16, 2023
@embik
Copy link
Member Author

embik commented Oct 16, 2023

/retest

1 similar comment
@embik
Copy link
Member Author

embik commented Oct 16, 2023

/retest

@embik embik changed the title WIP: 🌱 Increase resource requests on Prow jobs but only run if code changed 🌱 Increase resource requests on Prow jobs but only run if code changed Oct 16, 2023
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 16, 2023
@embik
Copy link
Member Author

embik commented Oct 16, 2023

/cc @mjudeikis @xrstf

Copy link
Contributor

@xrstf xrstf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2023
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 739ddc40786e4b7a31888f220a1460d3abbb569f

@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrstf

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 16, 2023
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot merged commit 2f76cac into kcp-dev:main Oct 16, 2023
20 checks passed
@embik embik deleted the prow-config-improvements branch October 16, 2023 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants