Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Use more specific type in argument of DB.Update #162

Merged

Conversation

znerol
Copy link
Contributor

@znerol znerol commented Apr 9, 2019

The DB.Update function takes a type of ACMETxt. However, the function
only requires the Value and Subdomain fields.

Refactor the function such that it takes ACMETxtPost instead of the full
ACMETxt record. This will simplify extraction of txt-record related
logic from the db code.

The DB.Update function takes a type of ACMETxt. However, the function
only requires the Value and Subdomain fields.

Refactor the function such that it takes ACMETxtPost instead of the full
ACMETxt record. This will simplify extraction of txt-record related
logic from the db code.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.831% when pulling ed32c53 on znerol-forks:refactor/master/more-specific-param-type into af5d256 on joohoi:master.

@joohoi joohoi merged commit c13035a into joohoi:master Jun 12, 2019
@joohoi
Copy link
Owner

joohoi commented Jun 12, 2019

Thanks for the PR, sorry it took me so long to get around it.

jacobmyers-codeninja pushed a commit to jacobmyers-codeninja/acme-dns that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2020
The DB.Update function takes a type of ACMETxt. However, the function
only requires the Value and Subdomain fields.

Refactor the function such that it takes ACMETxtPost instead of the full
ACMETxt record. This will simplify extraction of txt-record related
logic from the db code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants