some additions and clarifications

exampleDeedyResume.md

@@ -9,23 +9,31 @@ one with the openfonts as found on the git-repo, one with *other*
 open free fonts to substitute the Mac fonts (namely TeX Gyre
 Heros and Lato),
 
+Locale , template Version , class date , note , url
+git-repo , v.1.2 , 2014-09-16 , open and mac , https://github.com/deedydas/Deedy-Resume
+overleaf , v.1.1 , 2014-04-30 , openfonts , https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/deedy-resume/sqdbztjjghvz#.U2H9Kq1dV18
+sharelatex , v.1.1 , 2014-04-30 , openfonts , https://www.sharelatex.com/templates/5367ac4380bde19571bf9c21
+sharelatexMod , v.1.0 , 2014-04-30 , TeX Gyre fonts , https://www.sharelatex.com/templates/5363d55e3933f46a7b906f9a
+vel , v.1.0 , 2014-04-30 , macfonts , http:https://www.latextemplates.com/template/deedy-resume-cv
 
-git-repo v.1.2 2014-09-16 
-overleaf v.1.1 2014-04-30 (openfonts)
-sharelatex v.1.1 2014-04-30 (openfonts)
-sharelatexMod v.1.0 2014-04-30 (TeX Gyre fonts)
-vel v.1.0 2014-05-05 (macfonts}
 
-
-All tex and class files differ, more or less, even with the same
-date set in `ProvidesClass`. 
+All class files differ, more or less, even with the same
+date set in `ProvidesClass`. 
+The template versions (the class file does have a date, but no
+version note) are different, the tex files will differ anyway.
 
 A user looking for a template will see the online services first,
 the original repo last (at least i guess). Doing support, we get
 a *I use deedy template question* and have 5 possible starting
 points. Asking the user questions just to know with which
 specific template to work on will be annoying for both sides.
 
+Are those 5 different projects forks of one major project,
+different branches if you like? Since they are used standalone,
+shouldn't they have a specific name? 
+
+Any thoughts of the template providers concerning this *issue*? Is this
+an issue after all? What do other helpers think?
 
 PS: The git repo has 168 forks.