Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: expand on how jest version is determined and common workarounds #897

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

docs: expand on how jest version is determined and common workarounds #897

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8d1ca5e
docs: expand on how jest version is determined and common workarounds
G-Rath Sep 17, 2021
ac1a600
docs: link to `no-deprecated-functions` from readme
G-Rath Sep 22, 2021
0626bbb
docs(no-deprecated-function): link to readme section about jest version
G-Rath Sep 22, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
docs(no-deprecated-function): link to readme section about jest version
  • Loading branch information
@G-Rath
G-Rath committed Sep 22, 2021
commit 0626bbb03b4e386b343b4d561e5714aa7937f86a
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/rules/no-deprecated-functions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ either been renamed for clarity, or replaced with more powerful APIs.
While typically these deprecated functions are kept in the codebase for a number
of majors, eventually they are removed completely.

This rule requires knowing which version of Jest you're using - see
[this section of the readme](README.md) for details on how that is obtained
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This link doesn't work, does it?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No it doesn't - IntelliJ seems to have weird handling of relative links in nested docs :/

automatically and how you can explicitly provide a version if needed.

## Rule details

This rule warns about calls to deprecated functions, and provides details on
Expand Down