A modern, simple, fast & flexible micro framework for building HTTP REST/RPC APIs in Go backed by OpenAPI 3 and JSON Schema. Pronounced IPA: /'hjuΛmΙ/. The goals of this project are to provide:
- Incremental adoption for teams with existing services
- Bring your own router, middleware, and logging/metrics
- Extensible OpenAPI & JSON Schema layer to document existing routes
- A modern REST or HTTP RPC API backend framework for Go developers
- Described by OpenAPI 3.1 & JSON Schema
- Guard rails to prevent common mistakes
- Documentation that can't get out of date
- High-quality generated developer tooling
Features include:
- Declarative interface on top of your router of choice:
- Operation & model documentation
- Request params (path, query, or header)
- Request body
- Responses (including errors)
- Response headers
- JSON Errors using RFC7807 and
application/problem+json
by default (but can be changed) - Per-operation request size limits with sane defaults
- Content negotiation between server and client
- Conditional requests support, e.g.
If-Match
orIf-Unmodified-Since
header utilities. - Optional automatic generation of
PATCH
operations that support: - Annotated Go types for input and output models
- Generates JSON Schema from Go types
- Static typing for path/query/header params, bodies, response headers, etc.
- Automatic input model validation & error handling
- Documentation generation using Stoplight Elements
- Optional CLI built-in, configured via arguments or environment variables
- Set via e.g.
-p 8000
,--port=8000
, orSERVICE_PORT=8000
- Startup actions & graceful shutdown built-in
- Set via e.g.
- Generates OpenAPI for access to a rich ecosystem of tools
- Mocks with API Sprout or Prism
- SDKs with OpenAPI Generator or oapi-codegen
- CLI with Restish
- And plenty more
- Generates JSON Schema for each resource using optional
describedby
link relation headers as well as optional$schema
properties in returned objects that integrate into editors for validation & completion.
This project was inspired by FastAPI. Logo & branding designed by Kari Taylor.
Install via go get
. Note that Go 1.20 or newer is required.
# After: go mod init ...
go get -u github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/v2
Here is a complete basic hello world example in Huma, that shows how to initialize a Huma app complete with CLI, declare a resource operation, and define its handler function.
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"net/http"
"github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/v2"
"github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/v2/adapters/humachi"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
)
// Options for the CLI.
type Options struct {
Port int `help:"Port to listen on" short:"p" default:"8888"`
}
// GreetingInput represents the greeting operation request.
type GreetingInput struct {
Name string `path:"name" maxLength:"30" example:"world" doc:"Name to greet"`
}
// GreetingOutput represents the greeting operation response.
type GreetingOutput struct {
Body struct {
Message string `json:"message" example:"Hello, world!" doc:"Greeting message"`
}
}
func main() {
// Create a CLI app which takes a port option.
cli := huma.NewCLI(func(hooks huma.Hooks, options *Options) {
// Create a new router & API
router := chi.NewMux()
api := humachi.New(router, huma.DefaultConfig("My API", "1.0.0"))
// Register GET /greeting/{name}
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "get-greeting",
Summary: "Get a greeting",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/greeting/{name}",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *GreetingInput) (*GreetingOutput, error) {
resp := &GreetingOutput{}
resp.Body.Message = fmt.Sprintf("Hello, %s!", input.Name)
return resp, nil
})
// Tell the CLI how to start your router.
hooks.OnStart(func() {
http.ListenAndServe(fmt.Sprintf(":%d", options.Port), router)
})
})
// Run the CLI. When passed no commands, it starts the server.
cli.Run()
}
You can test it with go run greet.go
(optionally pass --port
to change the default) and make a sample request using Restish (or curl
):
# Get the message from the server
$ restish :8888/greeting/world
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
{
$schema: "https://localhost:8888/schemas/GreetingOutputBody.json",
message: "Hello, world!"
}
Even though the example is tiny you can also see some generated documentation at https://localhost:8888/docs. The generated OpenAPI is available at https://localhost:8888/openapi.json or https://localhost:8888/openapi.yaml.
Official Go package documentation can always be found at https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/v2. Below is an introduction to the various features available in Huma.
π³ Hi there! I'm the happy Huma whale here to provide help. You'll see me leave helpful tips down below.
Huma is designed to be router-agnostic to enable incremental adoption in existing and new services across a large number of organizations. This means you can use any router you want, or even write your own. The only requirement is and implementation of a small huma.Adapter
interface. This is how Huma integrates with your router.
Adapters are in the adapters
directory and named after the router they support. Many common routers are supported out of the box:
- chi via
humachi
- gin via
humagin
- gorilla/mux via
humamux
- httprouter via
humahttprouter
- Fiber via
humafiber
Adapters are instantiated by wrapping your router and providing a Huma configuration object which describes the API. Here is a simple example using Chi:
// Create your router.
app := chi.NewMux()
// Wrap the router with Huma to create an API instance.
api := humachi.New(app, huma.DefaultConfig("My API", "1.0.0"))
// Register your operations with the API.
// ...
// Start the server!
http.ListenAndServe(":8888", r)
π³ Writing your own adapter is quick and simple, and PRs are accepted for additional adapters to be built-in.
Huma has support two variants of middlewares:
- Router-specific - works at the router level, i.e. before router-agnostic middleware, you can use any middleware that is implemented for your router.
- Router-agnostic - runs in the Huma processing chain, i.e. after calls to router-specific middleware.
Each router implementation has its own middlewares, you can use this middlewares with huma v2 framework.
Chi router example:
router := chi.NewMux()
router.Use(jwtauth.Verifier(tokenAuth))
api := humachi.New(router, defconfig)
π³ Huma v1 middleware is compatible with Chi v4, so if you use that router with Huma v2 you can continue to use the Huma v1 middleware.
You can write you own Huma v2 middleware without any dependency to the specific router implementation.
Example:
func MyMiddleware(ctx huma.Context, next func(huma.Context)) {
// I don't do anything
next(ctx)
}
func NewHumaAPI() huma.API {
// ...
api := humachi.New(router, config)
// OR api := humagin.New(router, config)
api.UseMiddleware(MyMiddleware)
}
Huma generates Open API 3.1.0 compatible JSON/YAML specs and provides rendered documentation automatically. Every operation that is registered with the API is included in the spec by default. The operation's inputs and outputs are used to generate the request and response parameters / schemas.
The API config controls where the OpenAPI, docs, and schemas are available. The default config uses /openapi.json
, /docs
, and /schemas
respectively. You can change these to whatever you want, or disable them entirely by leaving them blank.
You may want to customize the generated Open API spec. With Huma v2 you have full access and can modify it as needed in the API configuration or when registering operations. For example, to set up a security scheme:
config := huma.DefaultConfig("My API", "1.0.0")
config.Components.SecuritySchemes = map[string]*huma.SecurityScheme{
"bearer": {
Type: "http",
Scheme: "bearer",
BearerFormat: "JWT",
},
}
api := humachi.New(router, config)
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "get-greeting",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/greeting/{name}",
Summary: "Get a greeting",
Security: []map[string][]string{
{"bearer": {}},
},
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *GreetingInput) (*GreetingOutput, error) {
// ...
})
π³ See the OpenAPI 3.1 spec for everything that can be set and how it is expected to be used.
Because you have full access to the OpenAPI spec, you can compose it however you want and write convenience functions to make things more straightforward. The above example could be made easier to read:
config := huma.DefaultConfig("My API", "1.0.0")
config = withBearerAuthScheme(config)
api := humachi.New(router, config)
huma.Register(api, withBearerAuth(huma.Operation{
OperationID: "get-greeting",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/greeting/{name}",
Summary: "Get a greeting",
}), func(ctx context.Context, input *GreetingInput) (*GreetingOutput, error) {
// ...
})
Set this up however you like. Even the huma.Register
function can be wrapped or replaced by your organization to ensure that all operations are registered with the same settings.
Custom extensions to the OpenAPI are supported via the Extensions
field on most OpenAPI structs:
config := huma.DefaultConfig("My API", "1.0.0")
config.Extensions = map[string]any{
"my-extension": "my-value",
}
Anything in the Extensions
map will be flattened during serialization so that its fields are peers with the Extensions
peers in the OpenAPI spec. For example, the above would result in:
{
"openapi": "3.1.0",
"info": {
"title": "My API",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"my-extension": "my-value"
}
Using the default Huma config (or manually via the huma.SchemaLinkTransformer
), each resource operation returns a describedby
HTTP link relation header which references a JSON-Schema file. These schemas use the config.SchemasPath
to serve their content. For example:
Link: </schemas/Note.json>; rel="describedby"
Object resources (i.e. not arrays or simple scalars) can also optionally return a $schema
property with such a link, which enables the described-by relationship to outlive the HTTP request (i.e. saving the body to a file for later editing) and enables some editors like VSCode to provide code completion and validation as you type.
{
"$schema": "https://localhost:8888/schemas/Note.json",
"title": "I am a note title",
"contents": "Example note contents",
"labels": ["todo"]
}
Operations which accept objects as input will ignore the $schema
property, so it is safe to submit back to the API, aka "round-trip" the data.
π³ The
$schema
field is incredibly powerful when paired with Restish's edit command, giving you a quick and easy way to edit strongly-typed resources in your favorite editor.
Huma uses a customizable registry to keep track of all the schemas that have been generated from Go structs. This is used to avoid generating the same schema multiple times, and to provide a way to reference schemas by name for OpenAPI operations & hosted JSON Schemas.
The default schema implementation uses a map
to store schemas by name,generated from the Go type name without the package name. This supports recursive schemas and generates simple names like Thing
or ThingList
. Note that by design it does not support multiple models with the same name in different packages.
You can create your own registry with custom behavior by implementing the huma.Registry
interface and setting it on config.Components.Schemas
when creating your API.
Operations are at the core of Huma. They map an HTTP method verb and resource path to a handler function with well-defined inputs and outputs. Operations are created using the huma.Register
function:
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "your-operation-name",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/path/to/resource/{id}",
Summary: "A short description of the operation",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *YourInput) (*YourOutput, error) {
// ... Implementation goes here ...
})
π³ If following REST-ish conventions, operation paths should be nouns, and plural if they return more than one item. Good examples:
/notes
,/likes
,/users/{user-id}
,/videos/{video-id}/stats
, etc. Huma does not enforce this or care, so RPC-style paths are also fine to use. Use what works best for you and your team.
The operation handler function always has the following generic format, where Input
and Output
are custom structs defined by the developer that represent the entirety of the request (path/query/header params & body) and response (headers & body), respectively:
func(context.Context, *Input) (*Output, error)
There are many options available for configuring OpenAPI settings for the operation, and custom extensions are supported as well. See the huma.Operation
struct for more details.
π³ Did you know? The
OperationID
is used to generate friendly CLI commands in Restish and used when generating SDKs! It should be unique, descriptive, and easy to type.
Inputs and outputs are always structs that represent the entirety of the incoming request or outgoing response. This is a deliberate design decision to make it easier to reason about the data flow in your application. It also makes it easier to share code as well as generate documentation and SDKs.
Requests can have parameters and/or a body as input to the handler function. Inputs use standard Go structs with special fields and/or tags. Here are the available tags:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
path |
Name of the path parameter | path:"thing-id" |
query |
Name of the query string parameter | query:"q" |
header |
Name of the header parameter | header:"Authorization" |
required |
Mark a query/header param as required | required:"true" |
π³ The
required
tag is discouraged and is only used for query/header params, which should generally be optional for clients to send.
The following parameter types are supported out of the box:
Type | Example Inputs |
---|---|
bool |
true , false |
[u]int[16/32/64] |
1234 , 5 , -1 |
float32/64 |
1.234 , 1.0 |
string |
hello , t |
time.Time |
2020-01-01T12:00:00Z |
slice, e.g. []int |
1,2,3 , tag1,tag2 |
For example, if the parameter is a query param and the type is []string
it might look like ?tags=tag1,tag2
in the URI.
The special struct field Body
will be treated as the input request body and can refer to any other type or you can embed a struct or slice inline. If the body is a pointer, then it is optional. All doc & validation tags are allowed on the body in addition to these tags:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
contentType |
Override the content type | contentType:"application/octet-stream" |
required |
Mark the body as required | required:"true" |
RawBody []byte
can also be used alongside Body
or standalone to provide access to the []byte
used to validate & parse Body
, or to the raw input without any validation/parsing.
Example:
type MyInput struct {
ID string `path:"id"`
Detail bool `query:"detail" doc:"Show full details"`
Auth string `header:"Authorization"`
Body MyBody
RawBody []byte
}
A request to such an endpoint might look like:
# Via high-level operations:
$ restish api my-op 123 --detail=true --authorization=foo <body.json
# Via URL:
$ restish api/my-op/123?detail=true -H "Authorization: foo" <body.json
π³ You can use
RawBody []byte
without a correspondingBody
field in order to support file uploads.
Go struct tags are used to annotate inputs/output structs with information that gets turned into JSON Schema for documentation and validation.
The standard json
tag is supported and can be used to rename a field and mark fields as optional using omitempty
. The following additional tags are supported on model fields:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
doc |
Describe the field | doc:"Who to greet" |
format |
Format hint for the field | format:"date-time" |
enum |
A comma-separated list of possible values | enum:"one,two,three" |
default |
Default value | default:"123" |
minimum |
Minimum (inclusive) | minimum:"1" |
exclusiveMinimum |
Minimum (exclusive) | exclusiveMinimum:"0" |
maximum |
Maximum (inclusive) | maximum:"255" |
exclusiveMaximum |
Maximum (exclusive) | exclusiveMaximum:"100" |
multipleOf |
Value must be a multiple of this value | multipleOf:"2" |
minLength |
Minimum string length | minLength:"1" |
maxLength |
Maximum string length | maxLength:"80" |
pattern |
Regular expression pattern | pattern:"[a-z]+" |
minItems |
Minimum number of array items | minItems:"1" |
maxItems |
Maximum number of array items | maxItems:"20" |
uniqueItems |
Array items must be unique | uniqueItems:"true" |
minProperties |
Minimum number of object properties | minProperties:"1" |
maxProperties |
Maximum number of object properties | maxProperties:"20" |
example |
Example value | example:"123" |
readOnly |
Sent in the response only | readOnly:"true" |
writeOnly |
Sent in the request only | writeOnly:"true" |
deprecated |
This field is deprecated | deprecated:"true" |
Parameters have some additional validation tags:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
hidden |
Hide parameter from documentation | hidden:"true" |
Sometimes the built-in validation isn't sufficient for your use-case, or you want to do something more complex with the incoming request object. This is where resolvers come in.
Any input struct can be a resolver by implementing the huma.Resolver
or huma.ResolverWithPath
interface, including embedded structs. Each resolver takes the current context and can return a list of exhaustive errors. For example:
// MyInput demonstrates inputs/transformation
type MyInput struct {
Host string
Name string `query:"name"`
}
func (m *MyInput) Resolve(ctx huma.Context) []error {
// Get request info you don't normally have access to.
m.Host = ctx.Host()
// Transformations or other data validation
m.Name = strings.Title(m.Name)
return nil
}
// Then use it like any other input struct:
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "list-things",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/things",
Summary: "Get a filtered list of things",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *MyInput) (*YourOutput, error) {
fmt.Printf("Host: %s\n", input.Host)
fmt.Printf("Name: %s\n", input.Name)
})
It is recommended that you do not save the context object passed to the Resolve
method for later use.
For deeply nested structs within the request body, you may not know the current location of the field being validated (e.g. it may appear in multiple places or be shared by multiple request objects). The huma.ResolverWithPath
interface provides a path prefix that can be used to generate the full path to the field being validated. It uses a huma.PathBuffer
for efficient path generation reusing a shared buffer. For example:
func (m *MyInput) Resolve(ctx huma.Context, prefix *huma.PathBuffer) []error {
return []error{&huma.ErrorDetail{
Message: "Foo has a bad value",
Location: prefix.With("foo")
Value: m.Foo,
}}
}
π³ Prefer using built-in validation over resolvers whenever possible, as it will be better documented and is also usable by OpenAPI tooling to provide a better developer experience.
Resolvers can set errors as needed and Huma will automatically return a 400-level error response before calling your handler. This makes resolvers a good place to run additional complex validation steps so you can provide the user with a set of exhaustive errors.
type MyInput struct {
Host string
}
func (m *MyInput) Resolve(ctx huma.Context) []error {
if m.Host = ctx.Host(); m.Host == "localhost" {
return []error{&huma.ErrorDetail{
Message: "Unsupported host value!",
Location: "request.host",
Value: m.Host,
}}
}
return nil
}
It is also possible for resolvers to return custom HTTP status codes for the response, by returning an error which satisfies the huma.StatusError
interface. Errors are processed in the order they are returned and the last one wins, so this feature should be used sparingly. For example:
type MyInput struct{}
func (i *MyInput) Resolve(ctx huma.Context) []error {
return []error{huma.Error403Forbidden("nope")}
}
π³ Exhaustive errors lessen frustration for users. It's better to return three errors in response to one request than to have the user make three requests which each return a new different error.
Because inputs are just Go structs, they are composable and reusable. For example:
type AuthParam struct {
Authorization string `header:"Authorization"`
}
type PaginationParams struct {
Cursor string `query:"cursor"`
Limit int `query:"limit"`
}
// ... Later in the code
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "list-things",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/things",
Summary: "Get a filtered list of things",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input struct {
// Embed both structs to compose your input.
AuthParam
PaginationParams
}) {
fmt.Printf("Auth: %s, Cursor: %s, Limit: %d\n", input.Authorization, input.Cursor, input.Limit)
}
A combination of the server and the request context can be used to control deadlines & timeouts. Go's built-in HTTP server supports a few timeout settings:
srv := &http.Server{
ReadTimeout: 5 * time.Second,
WriteTimeout: 5 * time.Second,
IdleTimeout: 30 * time.Second,
ReadHeaderTimeout: 2 * time.Second,
// ...
}
The Huma request context (accessible via resolvers) can be used to set a read deadline, which can be used to process large or streaming inputs:
type MyInput struct {}
func (m *MyInput) Resolve(ctx huma.Context) []error {
ctx.SetReadDeadline(time.Now().Add(5 * time.Second))
}
Additionally, a context.Context
can be used to set a deadline for dependencies like databases:
// Create a new context with a 10 second timeout.
newCtx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, 10 * time.Second)
defer cancel()
// Use the new context for any dependencies.
result, err := myDB.Get(newCtx, /* ... */)
if err != nil {
// Deadline may have been hit, handle it here!
}
By default each operation has a 1 MiB request body size limit. This can be changed by setting huma.Operation.MaxBodyBytes
to a different value when registering the operation. If the request body is larger than the limit then a 413 Request Entity Too Large
error will be returned.
Responses can have an optional status code, headers, and/or body. Like inputs, they use standard Go structs. Here are the available tags:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
header |
Name of the response header | header:"Authorization" |
The special struct field Status
with a type of int
is used to optionally communicate a dynamic response status code from the handler (you should not need this most of the time!). If not present, the default is to use 200
for responses with bodies and 204
for responses without a body. Use huma.Operation.DefaultStatus
at operation registration time to override. Note: it is much more common to set the default status code than to need a Status
field in your response struct!
The special struct field Body
will be treated as the response body and can refer to any other type or you can embed a struct or slice inline. Use a type of []byte
to bypass serialization. A default Content-Type
header will be set if none is present, selected via client-driven content negotiation with the server based on the registered serialization types.
Example:
type MyOutput struct {
Status int
LastModified time.Time `header:"Last-Modified"`
Body MyBody
}
The response Body
can also be a callback function taking a huma.Context
to facilitate streaming. The huma.StreamResponse
utility makes this easy to return:
func handler(ctx context.Context, input *MyInput) (*huma.StreamResponse, error) {
return &huma.StreamResponse{
Body: func(ctx huma.Context) {
// Write header info before streaming the body.
ctx.SetHeader("Content-Type", "text/my-stream")
writer := ctx.BodyWriter()
// Update the write deadline to give us extra time.
if d, ok := bw.(interface{ SetWriteDeadline(time.Time) error }); ok {
d.SetWriteDeadline(time.Now().Add(5 * time.Second))
} else {
fmt.Println("warning: unable to set write deadline")
}
// Write the first message, then flush and wait.
writer.Write([]byte("Hello, I'm streaming!"))
if f, ok := writer.(http.Flusher); ok {
f.Flush()
} else {
fmt.Println("error: unable to flush")
}
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
// Write the second message.
writer.Write([]byte("Hello, I'm still streaming!"))
},
}, nil
}
Also take a look at http.ResponseController
which can be used to set timeouts, flush, etc in one simple interface.
π³ The
sse
package provides a helper for streaming Server-Sent Events (SSE) responses that is easier to use than the above example!
Schemas that are generated for input/output bodies can be customized in a couple of different ways. First, when registering your operation you can provide your own request and/or response schemas if you want to override the entire body. The automatic generation only applies when you have not provided your own schema in the OpenAPI.
Second, this can be done on a per-field basis by making a struct that implements a special interface to get a schema, allowing you to e.g. encapsulate additional functionality within that field. This is the interface:
// SchemaProvider is an interface that can be implemented by types to provide
// a custom schema for themselves, overriding the built-in schema generation.
// This can be used by custom types with their own special serialization rules.
type SchemaProvider interface {
Schema(r huma.Registry) *huma.Schema
}
The huma.Registry
is passed to you and can be used to get schemas or refs for any embedded structs. Here is an example, where we want to know if a field was omitted vs. null vs. a value when sent as part of a request body. First we start by defininig the custom generic struct:
// OmittableNullable is a field which can be omitted from the input,
// set to `null`, or set to a value. Each state is tracked and can
// be checked for in handling code.
type OmittableNullable[T any] struct {
Sent bool
Null bool
Value T
}
// UnmarshalJSON unmarshals this value from JSON input.
func (o *OmittableNullable[T]) UnmarshalJSON(b []byte) error {
if len(b) > 0 {
o.Sent = true
if bytes.Equal(b, []byte("null")) {
o.Null = true
return nil
}
return json.Unmarshal(b, &o.Value)
}
return nil
}
// Schema returns a schema representing this value on the wire.
// It returns the schema of the contained type.
func (o OmittableNullable[T]) Schema(r huma.Registry) *huma.Schema {
return r.Schema(reflect.TypeOf(o.Value), true, "")
}
This is how it can be used in an operation:
type MyResponse struct {
Body struct {
Message string `json:"message"`
}
}
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "omittable",
Method: http.MethodPost,
Path: "/omittable",
Summary: "Omittable / nullable example",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *struct {
// Making the body a pointer makes it optional, as it may be `nil`.
Body *struct {
Name OmittableNullable[string] `json:"name,omitempty" maxLength:"10"`
}
}) (*MyResponse, error) {
resp := &MyResponse{}
if input.Body == nil {
resp.Body.Message = "Body was not sent"
} else if !input.Body.Name.Sent {
resp.Body.Message = "Name was omitted from the request"
} else if input.Body.Name.Null {
resp.Body.Message = "Name was set to null"
} else {
resp.Body.Message = "Name was set to: " + input.Body.Name.Value
}
return resp, nil
})
If you go to view the generated docs, you will see that the type of the name
field is string
and that it is optional, with a max length of 10, indicating that the custom schema was correctly used in place of one generated for the OmittableNullable[string]
struct.
See https://github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/blob/main/examples/omit/main.go for a full example along with how to call it. This just scratches the surface of what's possible with custom schemas for fields.
Errors use RFC 7807 and return a structure that looks like:
{
"status": 504,
"title": "Gateway Timeout",
"detail": "Problem with HTTP request",
"errors": [
{
"message": "Get \"https://httpstat.us/418?sleep=5000\": context deadline exceeded"
}
]
}
The errors
field is optional and may contain more details about which specific errors occurred.
It is recommended to return exhaustive errors whenever possible to prevent user frustration with having to keep retrying a bad request and getting back a different error. Input parameters validation, body validation, resolvers, etc all support returning exhaustive errors.
While every attempt is made to return exhaustive errors within Huma, each individual response can only contain a single HTTP status code. The following chart describes which codes get returned and when:
flowchart TD
Request[Request has errors?] -->|yes| Panic
Request -->|no| Continue[Continue to handler]
Panic[Panic?] -->|yes| 500
Panic -->|no| RequestBody[Request body too large?]
RequestBody -->|yes| 413
RequestBody -->|no| RequestTimeout[Request took too long to read?]
RequestTimeout -->|yes| 408
RequestTimeout -->|no| ParseFailure[Cannot parse input?]
ParseFailure -->|yes| 400
ParseFailure -->|no| ValidationFailure[Validation failed?]
ValidationFailure -->|yes| 422
ValidationFailure -->|no| 400
This means it is possible to, for example, get an HTTP 408 Request Timeout
response that also contains an error detail with a validation error for one of the input headers. Since request timeout has higher priority, that will be the response status code that is returned.
Router middleware operates on router-specific request & response objects whose bodies are []byte
slices or streams. Huma operations operate on specific struct instances. Sometimes there is a need to generically operate on structured response data after the operation handler has run but before the response is serialized to bytes. This is where response transformers come in.
flowchart LR
Request --> Middleware
Middleware --> Unmarshal
subgraph Huma
Unmarshal --> Handler
Handler --> Transformer
Transformer --> Marshal
end
Marshal --> Response
style Transformer stroke:#f9f,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
Response transformers enable you to modify the response on the fly. For example, you could add a Link
header to the response to indicate that the response body is described by a JSON Schema. This is done by implementing the huma.Transformer
interface and registering it with the API. See the huma.SchemaLinkTransformer
for an example.
Huma supports custom serialization formats by implementing the huma.Format
interface. Serialization formats are set on the API configuration at API creation time and selected by client-driven content negotiation using the Accept
or Content-Type
headers. The config.Formats
maps either a content type name or extension (suffix) to a huma.Format
instance.
The default configuration for Huma includes support for JSON (RFC 8259) and CBOR (RFC 7049) content types via the Accept
header. This is done by registering the following content types using huma.DefaultJSONFormat
& huma.DefaultCBORFormat
:
application/json
- Anything ending with
+json
application/cbor
- Anything ending with
+cbor
π³ You can easily add support for additional serialization formats, including binary formats like Protobuf if desired.
Content negotiation allows clients to select the content type they are most comfortable working with when talking to the API. For request bodies, this uses the Content-Type
header. For response bodies, it uses the Accept
header. If none are present then JSON is usually selected as the default / preferred content type.
See the negotiation
package for more info.
Huma ships with a built-in lightweight utility to wrap your service with a CLI, enabling you to run it with different arguments and easily write custom commands to do things like print out the OpenAPI or run on-demand database migrations.
The CLI options use a similar strategy to input & output structs, enabling you to use the same pattern for validation and documentation of command line arguments. It uses Cobra & Viper under the hood, enabling automatic environment variable binding and more.
// First, define your input options.
type Options struct {
Debug bool `doc:"Enable debug logging"`
Host string `doc:"Hostname to listen on."`
Port int `doc:"Port to listen on." short:"p" default:"8888"`
}
func main() {
// Then, create the CLI.
cli := huma.NewCLI(func(hooks huma.Hooks, opts *Options) {
fmt.Printf("I was run with debug:%v host:%v port%v\n",
opts.Debug, opts.Host, opts.Port)
})
// Run the thing!
cli.Run()
}
You can then run the CLI with and see the results:
$ go run main.go
I was run with debug:false host: port:8888
To do useful work, you will want to register a handler for the default start command and optionally a way to gracefully shutdown the server:
cli := huma.NewCLI(func(hooks huma.Hooks, opts *Options) {
hooks.OnStart(func() {
// Start your server here
http.ListenAndServe(
fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", opts.Host, opts.Port), myRouter,
)
})
hooks.OnStop(func() {
// Gracefully shutdown your server here
// ...
})
})
π³ Option fields are automatically converted to
--kebab-casing
for use on the command line. If you want to use a different name, use thename
struct tag to override the default behavior!
Custom options are defined by adding to your options struct. The following types are supported:
Type | Example Inputs |
---|---|
bool |
true , false |
int / int64 |
1234 , 5 , -1 |
string |
prod , https://api.example.tld/ |
The following struct tags are available:
Tag | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
default |
Default value (parsed automatically) | default:"123" |
doc |
Describe the option | doc:"Who to greet" |
name |
Override the name of the option | name:"my-option-name" |
short |
Single letter short name for the option | short:"p" for -p |
You can access the root cobra.Command
via cli.Root()
and add new custom commands via cli.Root().AddCommand(...)
. For example, to have a command print out the generated OpenAPI:
var api huma.API
// ... set up the CLI, create the API wrapping the router ...
cli.Root().AddCommand(&cobra.Command{
Use: "openapi",
Short: "Print the OpenAPI spec",
Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
b, _ := yaml.Marshal(api.OpenAPI())
fmt.Println(string(b))
},
})
Now you can run your service and use the new command: go run main.go openapi
.
If you want to access your custom options struct with custom commands, use the huma.WithOptions(func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, options *YourOptions)) func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string)
utitity function. It ensures the options are parsed and available before running your command.
π³ You can also overwite
cli.Root().Run
to completely customize how you run the server. Or just ditch thecli
package altogether!
There are built-in utilities for handling conditional requests, which serve two broad purposes:
- Sparing bandwidth on reading a document that has not changed, i.e. "only send if the version is different from what I already have"
- Preventing multiple writers from clobbering each other's changes, i.e. "only save if the version on the server matches what I saw last"
Adding support for handling conditional requests requires four steps:
- Import the
github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/conditional
package. - (optional) Add the response definition (
304 Not Modified
for reads or412 Precondition Failed
for writes) - Add
conditional.Params
to your input struct. - Check if conditional params were passed and handle them. The
HasConditionalParams()
andPreconditionFailed(...)
methods can help with this.
Implementing a conditional read might look like:
huma.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "get-resource",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/resource",
Summary: "Get a resource",
}, func(ctx context.Context, input struct {
conditional.Params
}) (*YourOutput, error) {
if input.HasConditionalParams() {
// TODO: Get the ETag and last modified time from the resource.
etag := ""
modified := time.Time{}
// If preconditions fail, abort the request processing. Response status
// codes are already set for you, but you can optionally provide a body.
// Returns an HTTP 304 not modified.
if err := input.PreconditionFailed(etag, modified); err != nil {
return err
}
// Otherwise do the normal request processing here...
// ...
}
})
π³ Note that it is more efficient to construct custom DB queries to handle conditional requests, however Huma is not aware of your database. The built-in conditional utilities are designed to be generic and work with any data source, and are a quick and easy way to get started with conditional request handling.
If a GET
and a PUT
exist for the same resource, but no PATCH
exists at server start up, then a PATCH
operation can be generated for you to make editing more convenient for clients. You can opt-in to this behavior with the autopatch
package:
import "github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/autopatch"
// ...
// Later in the code *after* registering operations...
autopatch.AutoPatch(api)
If the GET
returns an ETag
or Last-Modified
header, then these will be used to make conditional requests on the PUT
operation to prevent distributed write conflicts that might otherwise overwrite someone else's changes.
The following formats are supported out of the box, selected via the Content-Type
header:
- JSON Merge Patch
application/merge-patch+json
- Shorthand Merge Patch
application/merge-patch+shorthand
- JSON Patch
application/json-patch+json
If the PATCH
request has no Content-Type
header, or uses application/json
or a variant thereof, then JSON Merge Patch is assumed.
π³ You can think of the Shorthand Merge Patch as an extension to the JSON merge patch with support for field paths, arrays, and a few other features. Patches like this are possible, appending an item to an array (creating it if needed):
{ foo.bar[]: "baz", }
The sse
package provides a helper for streaming Server-Sent Events (SSE) responses. It provides a simple API for sending events to the client and documents the event types and data structures in the OpenAPI spec if you provide a mapping of message type names to Go structs:
// Register using sse.Register instead of huma.Register
sse.Register(api, huma.Operation{
OperationID: "sse",
Method: http.MethodGet,
Path: "/sse",
Summary: "Server sent events example",
}, map[string]any{
// Mapping of event type name to Go struct for that event.
"message": DefaultMessage{},
"userCreate": UserCreatedEvent{},
"mailRecieved": MailReceivedEvent{},
}, func(ctx context.Context, input *struct{}, send sse.Sender) {
// Send an event every second for 10 seconds.
for x := 0; x < 10; x++ {
send.Data(MailReceivedEvent{UserID: "abc123"})
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
}
})
π³ Each event model must be a unique Go type. If you want to reuse Go type definitions, you can define a new type referencing another type, e.g.
type MySpecificEvent MyBaseEvent
and it will work as expected.
Huma includes built-in support for an OpenAPI 3 extension that enables CLI autoconfiguration. This allows tools like Restish to automatically configure themselves to talk to your API with the correct endpoints, authentication mechanism, etc without the user needing to know anything about your API.
o := api.OpenAPI()
o.Components.SecuritySchemes["my-scheme"] = &huma.SecurityScheme{
Type: "oauth2",
// ... security scheme definition ...
}
o.Extensions["x-cli-autoconfig"] = huma.AutoConfig{
Security: "my-scheme",
Params: map[string]string{
"client_id": "abc123",
"authorize_url": "https://example.tld/authorize",
"token_url": "https://example.tld/token",
"scopes": "read,write",
}
}
See the CLI AutoConfiguration documentation for more info, including how to ask the user for custom parameters.
Huma includes a utility to make it a little easier to validate models outside of the normal HTTP request/response flow, for example on app startup to load example or default data and verify it is correct. This is just a thin wrapper around the built-in validation functionality, but abstracts away some of the boilerplate required for efficient operation and provides a simple API.
type MyExample struct {
Name string `json:"name" maxLength:"5"`
Age int `json:"age" minimum:"25"`
}
var value any
json.Unmarshal([]byte(`{"name": "abcdefg", "age": 1}`), &value)
validator := huma.ModelValidator()
errs := validator.Validate(reflect.TypeOf(MyExample{}), value)
if errs != nil {
fmt.Println("Validation error", errs)
}
π³ The
huma.ModelValidator
is not goroutine-safe! For more flexible validation, use thehuma.Validate
function directly and provide your own registry, path buffer, validation result struct, etc.
Huma v2 is written so that you can use the low-level API directly if you want to. This is useful if you want to add some new feature or abstraction that Huma doesn't support out of the box. Huma's own huma.Register
function, automatic HTTP PATCH
handlers, and the sse
package are all built on top of the public low-level API.
The adapter is the core of Huma's bring-your-own-router functionality. It is an abstraction on top of routers and HTTP libraries that operates on a generic huma.Context
described below. The adapter interface is simple and allows registering operation handlers and serving standard library HTTP requests:
type Adapter interface {
Handle(op *Operation, handler func(ctx Context))
ServeHTTP(http.ResponseWriter, *http.Request)
}
The context provides a generic HTTP layer which is translated into specific router operations when called by the adapter.
type Context interface {
Operation() *Operation
Context() context.Context
Method() string
Host() string
URL() url.URL
Param(name string) string
Query(name string) string
Header(name string) string
EachHeader(cb func(name, value string))
BodyReader() io.Reader
GetMultipartForm() (*multipart.Form, error)
SetReadDeadline(time.Time) error
SetStatus(code int)
SetHeader(name, value string)
AppendHeader(name, value string)
BodyWriter() io.Writer
}
The huma.Register
function is a highly-optimized wrapper around the low-level API that handles all the OpenAPI generation, validation, and serialization for you. It is a good example of how to use the low-level API. At a high level it does the following:
- Adds OpenAPI descriptions of the operation to the OpenAPI spec
- Registers an operation handler with the adapter
- Reads request parameters (
ctx.Param
,ctx.Query
,ctx.Header
) - Parses request body if present (
ctx.BodyReader
) - Calls the user's handler function with all inputs
- Handles errors returned from the handler by writing to the
ctx
- Writes success response (
ctx.SetStatus
,ctx.SetHeader
,ctx.BodyWriter
)
- Reads request parameters (
π³ Because
huma.Register
uses only the public interfaces of the low-level API, you can easily wrap it or write your own register function to provide new functionality.
- Import
github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/v2
instead ofgithub.com/danielgtaylor/huma
. - Use the
humachi.NewV4
adapter as Huma v1 uses Chi v4 under the hood - Attach your middleware to the
chi
instance. - Replace resource & operation creation with
huma.Register
- Rewrite handlers to be like
func(context.Context, *Input) (*Output, error)
- Return errors instead of
ctx.WriteError(...)
- Return instances instead of
ctx.WriteModel(...)
- Return errors instead of
- Define options via a struct and use
huma.NewCLI
to wrap the service
Note that GraphQL support from Huma v1 has been removed. Take a look at alternative tools like https://www.npmjs.com/package/openapi-to-graphql which will automatically generate a GraphQL endpoint from Huma's generated OpenAPI spec.
Significant performance improvements have been made since Huma v1, as shown by the following basic benchmark operation with a few input parameters, a small input body, some output headers and an output body (see adapters/humachi/humachi_test.go
).
# Huma v1
BenchmarkHumaV1Chi-10 16285 112086 ns/op 852209 B/op 258 allocs/op
# Huma v2
BenchmarkHumaV2ChiNormal-10 431028 2777 ns/op 1718 B/op 29 allocs/op
# Chi without Huma (raw)
BenchmarkRawChi-10 552764 2143 ns/op 2370 B/op 29 allocs/op
These improvements are due to a number of factors, including changes to the Huma API, precomputation of reflection data when possible, low or zero-allocation validation & URL parsing, using shared buffer pools to limit garbage collector pressure, and more.
Since you bring your own router, you are free to "escape" Huma by using the router directly, but as you can see above it's rarely needed with v2.
π³ Thanks for reading!