Improve training port conflict avoid #1181
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1181 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.72% 79.73% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 210 210
Lines 18805 18812 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 14992 15000 +8
+ Misses 3813 3812 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
majieyue
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2024
BalaBalaYi
requested changes
Jul 9, 2024
BalaBalaYi
merged commit 40dc735
into
intelligent-machine-learning:master
13 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We can configure the start port of the training job.
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Unit test.