-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update signal exchange block #49
Comments
@dhblum and @mwetter, |
It probably is better to consistently integrate all power outside of the Modelica model (I assume this is what you prefer) and hence remove the option to declare energy. If there is a strong case to have energy as a KPI indicator in Modelica, then we can add it later. It is easier to add features than removing (and breaking models that rely on the feature). |
I agree with Michael on this. |
Enumeration looks good. One thing is that in Aachen, @icupeiro mentioned that he may still like to keep the ability to tag multiple keywords to a signal (as before, the tagging was a comma-delimited list in a string parameter). Although, I can't think of a use case for this anymore. @icupeiro, what would be your use case? The KPI tags so far are:
|
|
Thanks Michael. Also CO2 for IAQ as discussed in Aachen. |
So that makes: AirZoneTemperature Please confirm or suggest further changes and I'll make another pull request. @dhblum and @icupeiro, I can't think of any case where it's required to tag more than one keyword to a signal. Actually I think that's not possible: a signal can be of only one type. For instance it could be either electric power or water, but they are mutually exclusive so cannot be both at the same time. It is then up to the KPI calculator to use the signals that are required for a specific KPI. |
In this commit ibpsa/modelica-ibpsa@e51759a I suggested a None type so that the Read block can be defaulted to having no KPI specified. |
In principle I was thinking in a main tag 'power' and a sub-tag 'gas', 'biomass', 'solarthermal', etc... but with this kind of tagging the problem is solved |
Ok thanks. In the future, we may consider sub-tags, particularly for adding more meta-data to the signals. |
Fourth task implemented by #93. |
Closed by #96 and ibpsa/modelica-ibpsa#1170. |
This issue corresponds to the updating of the signal exchange block in ibpsa/modelica-ibpsa#1059 to:
Description
todescription
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: