Better examples

[cronopio]

I just rewrite the examples, just using as base the old examples, so I updated all this examples according to the new improvements and the new api of node-http-proxy.

Review and merge

CC: @yawnt

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same when pulling db11bb4 on better-examples into 83367e7 on caronte.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same when pulling a3ed755 on better-examples into 83367e7 on caronte.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) when pulling bac210f on better-examples into 83367e7 on caronte.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) when pulling db952d1 on better-examples into 83367e7 on caronte.

[cronopio]

Ok there is a very weird trouble in test/examples-test.js, if I run it alone all the tests pass, but running all the suite using npm test give a trouble trying to require socket.io

TypeError: Cannot set property 'XHR' of undefined

The last part of the stack trace show this:

 TypeError: Cannot set property 'XHR' of undefined
      at object.module.io (/home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/examples/node_modules/socket.io-client/lib/io.js:127:22)
      at Object.<anonymous> (/home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/examples/node_modules/socket.io-client/lib/io.js:206:3)
      at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
      at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
      at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
      at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
      at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
      at require (module.js:380:17)
      at Object.<anonymous> (/home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/examples/node_modules/socket.io/lib/socket.io.js:12:14)
      at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
      at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
      at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
      at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
      at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
      at require (module.js:380:17)
      at Object.<anonymous> (/home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/examples/node_modules/socket.io/index.js:8:18)
      at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
      at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
      at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
      at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
      at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
      at require (module.js:380:17)
      at Object.<anonymous> (/home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/examples/websocket/latent-websocket-proxy.js:30:10)
      at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
      at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
      at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
      at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
      at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
      at require (module.js:380:17)
      at /home/cronopio/Nodejitsu/node-http-proxy/test/examples-test.js:65:21

...........

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) when pulling 89a00c0 on better-examples into 83367e7 on caronte.

[cronopio]

Ready for review and merge

cc: @yawnt @indexzero

[yawnt]

@cronopio looks good but i the travis CI build is failing, if you fix that we can merge :)

[cronopio]

@yawnt Thank you. Seems that there is a trouble running the coveralls script. Can I drop it from the .travis.yml and just set the npm test script?

[cronopio]

Actually I think there is the same trouble in caronte branch. Seems there is a trouble running the coveralls script using node 0.10 and break very bad using 0.11

[yawnt]

damn,sucks.. okay drop it T_T

[cronopio]

Oh. Seems that this commit 9e74a63 break the tests. I'll investigate and fix it before the merge. I'll let you know when is ready to merge

[yawnt]

okay, but i don't think it's related.. it's such an insignificant addition to the codebase :\

[cronopio]

Ok, I fixed the stuff and rebase it.

Now travis is failing due another stuff. This is ready to merge

[risacher]

For what it's worth, I have gotten caronte to work for my use case. See https://gist.github.com/risacher/8302220

[cronopio]

@risacher Oh thanks! that is helpful, I'll take a deep look in a few hours, maybe you can format it like the examples I made and then open a pull request 😉