Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

issue-4987-searchbundle-parts-are-labeled-by-default-as-include-instead-of-match #4988

Conversation

jmarchionatto
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +1.87 🎉

Comparison is base (2f5ffe7) 81.32% compared to head (940bd42) 83.20%.

❗ Current head 940bd42 differs from pull request most recent head 698e89b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 698e89b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4988      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     81.32%   83.20%   +1.87%     
- Complexity    23650    25613    +1963     
============================================
  Files          1425     1559     +134     
  Lines         86399    93462    +7063     
  Branches      11677    12425     +748     
============================================
+ Hits          70265    77765    +7500     
+ Misses        10947    10219     -728     
- Partials       5187     5478     +291     

see 1528 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jmarchionatto jmarchionatto merged commit 048c1f9 into master Jun 15, 2023
62 checks passed
@jmarchionatto jmarchionatto deleted the issue-4987-searchbundle-parts-are-labeled-by-default-as-include-instead-of-match branch June 15, 2023 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants