Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4917 refactor nicknaming hapi with version bump #4955

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

TipzCM
Copy link
Collaborator

@TipzCM TipzCM commented Jun 2, 2023

#4918

same code, but with version bump

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +1.83 🎉

Comparison is base (2f5ffe7) 81.32% compared to head (fd924ce) 83.16%.

❗ Current head fd924ce differs from pull request most recent head f407aaf. Consider uploading reports for the commit f407aaf to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4955      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     81.32%   83.16%   +1.83%     
- Complexity    23650    25559    +1909     
============================================
  Files          1425     1557     +132     
  Lines         86399    93229    +6830     
  Branches      11677    12418     +741     
============================================
+ Hits          70265    77532    +7267     
+ Misses        10947    10227     -720     
- Partials       5187     5470     +283     

see 1531 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TipzCM TipzCM merged commit 0a7f97a into master Jun 6, 2023
62 of 63 checks passed
@TipzCM TipzCM deleted the 4917-refactor-nicknaming-hapi-with-version-bump branch June 6, 2023 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants