Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

it may be that the port the remote process wants to listen on is taken #3

Closed
haarcuba opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

it may be that the port the remote process wants to listen on is taken #3

haarcuba opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@haarcuba
Labels
bug

Comments

@haarcuba
Copy link
Owner

haarcuba commented May 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

suggest that the remote process listen first, and then send data back to the local side with the correct port number. This requires the local process to have a listening socket and wait for info to come back, which introduces the issue - what if info never comes back? etc.
@haarcuba haarcuba added the bug label May 8, 2018
@haarcuba haarcuba self-assigned this May 8, 2018
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2018
@haarcuba
test for issue #3
20e04a9
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2018
@haarcuba
test for issue #3
01264bb
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2018
@haarcuba
port scanning enables us to get over issue #3
3f4a200
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
@haarcuba
issue #3 is Python 3 only
ea9900f
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2018
@haarcuba
ping the remote port in the background
358fc4a 
this is a nice-to-have sort of feature. It will usually work, but only
if the remote closer is Python 3, and if the remote process did not die too soon

closes issue #3
haarcuba added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
@haarcuba
ping the remote port in the background, closes issue #3
75f2816 
this is a nice-to-have sort of feature. It will usually work, but only
if the remote closer is Python 3, and if the remote process did not die too soon
@haarcuba haarcuba closed this as completed Jul 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@haarcuba haarcuba

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@haarcuba