Fix to allow user collection types. #46
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ust a UserType implementation, can now be specified for the "type" in the mapping.
|
|
bkoehm
commented
Jul 21, 2017
| } | ||
| value = new SimpleValue(mappings, table); | ||
| bindSimpleValue(currentGrailsProp, null, (SimpleValue) value, EMPTY_PATH, mappings, sessionFactoryBeanName); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (currentGrailsProp.getType().isEnum()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it's not immediately obvious, all I have done is switch the "if" and "else if" here so that the collectionType check comes first and the userType check comes second. Necessary because both userType and collectionType are not null when using a UserCollectionType as the "type" in the mapping.
|
Another pull forthcoming. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
i.e., a UserCollectionType, not just a UserType implementation, can now be specified for the "type" in the mapping.