Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add --dynamicimports alias; remove bitbucket doc link #112

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

add --dynamicimports alias; remove bitbucket doc link #112

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 31, 2016

No description provided.

@@ -6809,7 +6808,7 @@ def __init__(self, parents=None):
self.add_argument('--src-suitemodel', help='mechanism for locating imported suites', metavar='<arg>')
self.add_argument('--dst-suitemodel', help='mechanism for placing cloned/pushed suites', metavar='<arg>')
self.add_argument('--primary', action='store_true', help='limit command to primary suite')
self.add_argument('--dynamicimport', action='append', dest='dynamic_imports', help='dynamically import suite <name>', metavar='<name>', default=[])
self.add_argument('--dynamicimport', '--dynamicimports', action='append', dest='dynamic_imports', help='dynamically import suite <name>', metavar='<name>', default=[])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can just change --dynamicimport to --dynamicimports and still be backwards compatible as ArgumentParser does shortest unique prefix matching for options.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, forgot that little feature. Will do

@dougxc
Copy link
Member

dougxc commented Apr 2, 2016

Merged internally.

@dougxc dougxc closed this Apr 2, 2016
dougxc added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2016
…deps to master

* commit '1f85f366a9ccdbe0dba1aa78c459f1d81ce29e99':
  resolve deps for JdkLibrary objects in a BinarySuite
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant