A way to access content after <!--more--> marker

[ghost]

Currently one can get either the summary (.Summary) or all the content (.Content), but there's no way to access only the content after the marker, through a variable like .MoreContent, for example. In my case the summary and the rest are completely separate entities.

[anthonyfok]

Hi @opennota,
Is there a reason why you closed this issue before it was fixed? :-)

[ghost]

@anthonyfok I don't need it anymore, and it doesn't look like anyone else is interested.

[abirger]

@opennota, actually I would very much like this feature. I missed #716 and #718 in the first place, and I am glad that I've seen them now.

[anthonyfok]

Let's reopen this issue then! ;-)

[bep]

+1

[Dr-Terrible]

It would be nice to have both .Summary (only the summary) and .Footnotes (only the footnotes generated by blackfriday) coupled with .Body( .Content minus .Summary, minus .Footnotes) too.

[bep]

@Dr-Terrible for the BF related issues, see russross/blackfriday#166

[Dr-Terrible]

@bep Thank you, your idea about separate entities makes more sense. I didn't think about the ToC either.

[matthewdolman]

+1

I would like this. In fact the more that we can define sections in our content the better.

[matthewdolman]

If anyone is looking for a quick workaround for now you can do this:

{{ $body := replace .Content .Summary "" }}
{{ $body | safeHTML }}

[bep]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been commented on for at least four months.

The resources of the Hugo team are limited, and so we are asking for your help.

If this is a bug and you can still reproduce this error on the master branch, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

If this is a feature request, and you feel that it is still valuable, please open a proposal at https://discuss.gohugo.io/.

This issue will automatically be closed in four months if no further activity occurs. Thank you for all your contributions.

[bep]

Note/Update: This issue is marked as stale, and I may have said something earlier about "opening a thread on the discussion forum". Please don't.

If this is a bug and you can still reproduce this error on the latest release or the master branch, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

If this is a feature request, and you feel that it is still relevant and valuable, please tell us why.

[f3l1x]

I like an idea. 👍 What can I do for it?