Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

small code cleanup #1598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

small code cleanup #1598

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

methane
Copy link
Member

@methane methane commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

  • Go programmers familier with if err != nil {} than if err == nil {}.
  • Update some URLs about MySQL client/server protocol.

Checklist

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
  • All tests passing
  • Extended the README / documentation, if necessary
  • Added myself / the copyright holder to the AUTHORS file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error reporting and flow control in the query method, enhancing the reliability of database interactions.
    • Updated handling of result set headers to better manage different packet types and error conditions.

Go programmers familier with `if err != nil {}` than `if err == nil {}`.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on enhancing error handling and control flow within the MySQL connection and packet handling modules. Specifically, error reporting improvements were made to the query method in connection.go, along with refined handling of result set headers in packets.go. These changes aim to ensure more robust and accurate error detection and management during database operations.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
connection.go Improved error handling in query method for command packet writing and reading result set headers. Refactored flow for handling result sets.
packets.go Enhanced error handling in readResultSetHeaderPacket method. Adjusted switch case logic for different packet types (iOK, iERR, iLocalInFile). Added handling for iLocalInFile packets.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant M as mysqlConn
    participant P as Packet Handler

    C->>M: Execute query()
    M->>P: Write command packet
    P->>M: Command packet write response
    alt Command packet error
        M->>C: Return error
    else No error
        M->>P: Read result set header
        P->>M: Result set header data
        alt Header read error
            M->>C: Return error
        else No error
            alt iOK packet
                M->>C: Return result
            else iERR packet
                M->>C: Return error
            else iLocalInFile packet
                P->>M: handleInFileRequest()
                M->>C: Proceed with file request
            end
        end
    end
Loading

Poem

In the land of code where bugs were found,
Errors roamed and cases abound,
We sharpened our packets, fixed each plight,
Now queries flow both day and night. 🌜✨
With robust checks and flows so grand,
Our code's a fortress, firmly will stand! 🐇💻


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@methane
Copy link
Member Author

methane commented Jun 13, 2024

Most of changes are reducing indent.
Please review this with "hide whitespace" option.
image

@methane methane requested a review from shogo82148 June 13, 2024 14:55
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 82.368% (-0.04%) from 82.407%
when pulling d34ea7c on methane:reformat-code
into 9b8d28e on go-sql-driver:master.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
connection.go (2)

Line range hint 224-224: Refactor interpolateParams to reduce complexity and improve maintainability.

Consider breaking down the interpolateParams function into smaller, more manageable functions. For instance, handling different types could be extracted into separate helper functions. This will make the code easier to understand and maintain.


Line range hint 1-656: Consider enhancing logging and context handling.

While the error handling and connection management are robust, consider adding more detailed logging for error contexts and operational steps. This could help in debugging and maintaining high availability and reliability.

packets.go (7)

Line range hint 29-29: Consider refactoring readPacket to reduce its complexity.

The readPacket function is quite long, which might make it hard to maintain. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions or extracting certain parts of the logic into helper functions.


Line range hint 162-162: Consider refactoring readHandshakePacket to improve maintainability.

The readHandshakePacket function is significantly lengthy. Refactoring it into smaller functions could improve readability and maintainability. For instance, parsing different parts of the packet could be delegated to separate functions.


Line range hint 255-255: Refactor writeHandshakeResponsePacket to simplify its logic.

The writeHandshakeResponsePacket function contains too many statements, making it complex and hard to follow. Consider breaking it into smaller, focused functions or using helper functions to handle specific tasks like setting flags or handling TLS.


Line range hint 773-773: Reduce complexity in readRow by refactoring.

The readRow function is lengthy and contains many statements. Consider refactoring it to break down the logic into smaller, more manageable pieces, such as extracting the handling of different data types into separate functions.


Line range hint 968-968: Refactor writeExecutePacket to decrease its complexity.

The writeExecutePacket function is overly complex and lengthy. Refactoring it to separate concerns, such as parameter encoding and packet writing, into different functions or methods could greatly enhance clarity and maintainability.


Line range hint 1022-1022: Address high complexity in writeExecutePacket due to nested blocks.

The nested blocks within the if len(args) > 0 block in writeExecutePacket make the function complex. Consider simplifying these blocks or using strategies like early returns to reduce nesting and improve readability.


Line range hint 1234-1234: Reduce the number of statements in readRow to simplify the function.

The readRow function for binary rows is quite complex due to its length and the number of statements. Consider breaking it into smaller functions that handle specific parts of the row reading process.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b8d28e and d34ea7c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • connection.go (1 hunks)
  • packets.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
connection.go

224-224: Function 'interpolateParams' has too many statements (53 > 40) (funlen)

packets.go

29-29: Function 'readPacket' is too long (62 > 60) (funlen)


162-162: Function 'readHandshakePacket' is too long (88 > 60) (funlen)


255-255: Function 'writeHandshakeResponsePacket' has too many statements (66 > 40) (funlen)


673-673: Function 'readColumns' has too many statements (45 > 40) (funlen)


773-773: Function 'readRow' has too many statements (45 > 40) (funlen)


968-968: Function 'writeExecutePacket' has too many statements (108 > 40) (funlen)


1234-1234: Function 'readRow' has too many statements (92 > 40) (funlen)


1022-1022: if len(args) > 0 has complex nested blocks (complexity: 30) (nestif)

Additional comments not posted (2)
connection.go (1)

403-424: Improved error handling in the query method looks good.

The changes ensure that any network or parameter interpolation errors are caught and handled appropriately, improving the robustness of the connection handling.

packets.go (1)

Line range hint 673-673: Simplify readColumns by modularizing its components.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]
The readColumns function is complex due to the high number of statements. Breaking down the function into smaller, more focused functions could enhance readability and maintainability. For example, handling different types of fields could be extracted into separate functions.

Copy link
Contributor

@shogo82148 shogo82148 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@methane methane merged commit 87443b9 into go-sql-driver:master Jun 14, 2024
32 checks passed
@methane methane deleted the reformat-code branch June 14, 2024 04:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants