Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Users should not be able to prohibit their own login #10970

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 6, 2020

Conversation

a1012112796
Copy link
Member

Because I think it's crazy and not reasonale , that if a user can prohibit themself to login. so suggest limit this choice on ui.

Because I think it's crazy and not reasonale , that if a user can
prohibit themself to login. so suggest limit this choice on ui

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Apr 5, 2020
@zeripath zeripath added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Apr 5, 2020
@zeripath zeripath changed the title ui: limit managers prohibit themself to login Users should not be able to prohibit their own login Apr 5, 2020
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

zeripath commented Apr 5, 2020

Coming up with a succinct title for this PR is remarkably difficult!

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #10970 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10970      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.62%   43.60%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         597      597              
  Lines       83923    83923              
==========================================
- Hits        36613    36597      -16     
- Misses      42799    42813      +14     
- Partials     4511     4513       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/git/utils.go 65.67% <0.00%> (-4.48%) ⬇️
modules/process/manager.go 74.69% <0.00%> (-3.62%) ⬇️
services/pull/patch.go 62.93% <0.00%> (-2.80%) ⬇️
services/pull/temp_repo.go 29.05% <0.00%> (-2.57%) ⬇️
services/pull/check.go 50.00% <0.00%> (-1.83%) ⬇️
modules/queue/workerpool.go 56.93% <0.00%> (-1.07%) ⬇️
modules/git/repo.go 47.28% <0.00%> (-0.84%) ⬇️
models/lfs.go 17.27% <0.00%> (ø)
modules/lfs/server.go 40.35% <0.00%> (ø)
routers/swagger_json.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 6 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b74d30a...2c120af. Read the comment docs.

routers/admin/users.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
routers/admin/users.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
routers/admin/users.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 5, 2020
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

beside @guillep2k spell corect sugestion - lgtm

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

ping LG-TM

@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 88c1432 into go-gitea:master Apr 6, 2020
ydelafollye pushed a commit to ydelafollye/gitea that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2020
* ui: limit managers prohibit themself to login

Because I think it's crazy and not reasonale , that if a user can
prohibit themself to login. so suggest limit this choice on ui

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>

* skip self Prohibit Login in post event handle

* fix comment

Co-authored-by: zeripath <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <[email protected]>
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants