-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release/1.2.0 #583
Release/1.2.0 #583
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fastest review in the west!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
62a03d4
62a03d4
to
baa0a88
Compare
Replace it by reductions on a local variable instead, this seems to make TSAN happy.
Co-authored-by: Pratik Nayak <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tobias Ribizel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pratik Nayak <[email protected]>
This should now be in a working state. The compiled documentation is available in the original post. For some reason, a couple some got lost during the rebase so I had to manually fix the issues. A good way to see what changes with develop: git diff develop..release/1.2.0 |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #583 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 98.09% 84.22% -13.87%
===========================================
Files 215 296 +81
Lines 16058 20655 +4597
===========================================
+ Hits 15752 17397 +1645
- Misses 306 3258 +2952
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
After we are done with the release, I think we should increase the version in |
About the develop version, yes it would be nice but an issue is we do not know if we will have a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can the version contain letters? maybe like 1.2.0-develop
Or we could name is |
I found we already set |
Yes actually we do have that |
This merges all commits from develop into master for the release 1.2.0.
The documentation will be available here once updated:
https://ginkgo-project.github.io/ginkgo/doc/release/1.2.0/
We should see a
based on branch master
in the title.