Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates Redis to 6.2.10 #1937

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

danielhartnell
Copy link
Contributor

@danielhartnell danielhartnell commented Jan 26, 2023

Redis patched two CVEs in release 6.2.9. We would like to update the Sentry container to apply those fixes:

https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/6.2.9

After that release, it looks like they pushed a bug fix in 6.2.10 so it probably makes sense to bump up to that.

If there's anything I can do to help test or evaluate this change, let me know.

Copy link
Member

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but what version are we on in SaaS prod for the record @hubertdeng123?

@hubertdeng123
Copy link
Member

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

TIL image-mirror. Are we sure that's reflective of what's in SaaS?

@hubertdeng123
Copy link
Member

ok, let me confirm to be sure. Looks like redis 5.0 image is used for dev and I saw it being pulled in for getsentry tests

@hubertdeng123
Copy link
Member

Looks like depending on the cluster, we're running either 5.x of 6.x

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

Sounds good. Ship it! 🚢

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre merged commit b1fda9a into getsentry:master Feb 14, 2023
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

Thanks @danielhartnell! :-)

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants