Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(self-hosted): add NGINX as a reverse proxy example #1257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

oioki
Copy link
Member

@oioki oioki commented Apr 29, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
develop ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 29, 2024 2:23pm

@oioki oioki changed the title feat: add NGINX as a reverse proxy example docs(self-hosted): add NGINX as a reverse proxy example Apr 29, 2024
@oioki oioki requested a review from a team April 29, 2024 14:22
Copy link
Contributor

@aldy505 aldy505 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. Although it's very minimal, at least it's here.

It'd be good if you can put up some examples regarding rate limiter middleware (since SH don't have the concept of quotas and billings) and expose only ingest endpoints as specified here.

@aldy505
Copy link
Contributor

aldy505 commented Apr 29, 2024

/cc @hubertdeng123 @azaslavsky

Copy link
Contributor

@azaslavsky azaslavsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for adding this! :)

@oioki oioki merged commit 0c10943 into master Apr 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@oioki oioki deleted the feat/reverse-proxy-nginx branch April 29, 2024 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants