Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix nonce verification in Registration class #2298

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nichita231
Copy link

@nichita231 nichita231 commented Jun 25, 2024

Issue: #2279

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved security checks during vendor registration by refining nonce validation logic.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in includes/Registration.php focus on reordering the nonce check logic within the set_new_vendor_names and save_vendor_info functions. By leveraging the result from the dokan_register_nonce_check filter, the nonce validation is now conditional, potentially altering the functions' control flow based on the filter's outcome.

Changes

Files Change Summary
includes/Registration.php Reordered nonce check in set_new_vendor_names and save_vendor_info functions based on a filter's result

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Registration

    Client->>+Registration: set_new_vendor_names($data)
    alt dokan_register_nonce_check = true
        Registration->>Registration: Check empty($nonce_value)
        alt $nonce_value is empty or invalid
            Registration-->>Client: return $data
        else $nonce_value is valid
            Registration-->>Client: Process $data
        end
    else dokan_register_nonce_check = false
        Registration-->>Client: Process $data
    end

    Client->>+Registration: save_vendor_info($user_id, $data)
    alt dokan_register_nonce_check = true
        Registration->>Registration: Check empty($nonce_value)
        alt $nonce_value is empty or invalid
            Registration-->>Client: return
        else $nonce_value is valid
            Registration-->>Client: Save $data
        end
    else dokan_register_nonce_check = false
        Registration-->>Client: Save $data
    end
Loading

Poem

In the code, a nonce we weave,
Filters guide and checks believe.
Secure flows to vendor shore,
Data safe, we do implore.
With changes bright, we leap ahead,
CodeRabbit smiles; no woes to dread. 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2a44e3 and e55fb67.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Registration.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
includes/Registration.php (2)

95-103: Review of nonce verification changes in set_new_vendor_names

The changes introduce a conditional check ($nonce_check) which is determined by the dokan_register_nonce_check filter. This allows for more flexible nonce verification, potentially enabling or disabling it based on external conditions. The addition of checking for an empty nonce value before verifying it enhances the robustness of the function against empty or unset nonce values, which could be a security improvement.

However, ensure that the dokan_register_nonce_check filter is appropriately documented and that it is clear to developers how and when to manipulate this filter. Additionally, verify that this change aligns with all intended use cases of nonce verification in this context.


131-139: Review of nonce verification changes in save_vendor_info

This function mirrors the changes made in set_new_vendor_names by adding a conditional nonce check. The introduction of $nonce_check controlled by the dokan_register_nonce_check filter allows for conditional execution of nonce verification, which can be useful in scenarios where nonce verification might need to be bypassed or handled differently.

As with the previous function, it's important to ensure that the use of this filter is well understood and documented. The checks for empty nonce values before proceeding with wp_verify_nonce are crucial for security, ensuring that invalid or manipulated requests are properly handled.

@mrabbani
Copy link
Member

The issue of this PR is resolved in PR #2301.

You can bypass the nonce verification through dokan_register_nonce_check filter.

add_filter(  'dokan_register_nonce_check',  '__return_false' );

Thanks for your PR.

@mrabbani mrabbani closed this Jul 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants