Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUESTION] Is setting Cat up to 3 values really useful since emissions will only go into the first one? #9

Closed
FeiYao-Edinburgh opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
category: Question Further information is requested

Comments

@FeiYao-Edinburgh
Copy link

Hi there,

I came across this description "Up to three emission categories can be assigned to each entry (separated by the separator character). Emissions are always entirely written into the first listed category, while emissions of zero are used for any other assigned category." on HEMCO user guide. I am a little bit concerned and wonder whether it is an useless function? Since no values will go into the cat after the first one, they either do not contribute to GC species or summarised by HEMCO diagnostics? Can you convince me by some simple applications?

Thanks in advance!

Kind regard,
Fei

@FeiYao-Edinburgh FeiYao-Edinburgh added the category: Question Further information is requested label Dec 11, 2019
@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

I have updated the HEMCO User's guide with an explanation. See the table in this section.
http:https://wiki.geos-chem.org/The_HEMCO_User%27s_Guide#Base_emissions

BettyCroft pushed a commit to BettyCroft/HEMCO that referenced this issue May 24, 2022
…arget-and-install

Fixes GCHPctm's build's "all" target and installation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: Question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants