GO:0014823 response to activity -> "response to physical activity"

[ValWood]

If this term is required the label should be changed because it is misleading.

Here the activity referred to is "physical activity" not a molecular activity

210/286 annotations are IEP

(also GO:0014865 detection of activity)

[ValWood]

Also add superclass
GO:0032501 multicellular organismal process
to give taxon restriction

[ValWood]

@pgaudet do you agree with this?

The definition is
Any process that results in a change in state or activity of a cell or an organism (in terms of movement, secretion, enzyme production, gene expression, etc.) as a result of an activity stimulus.

but the related synonym
"response to exercise" implies this refers to physical activity?

GO:0014865 detection of activity
Is weird, but has not been used in annotation. I can obsolete that one?

[ValWood]

@pgaudet do you agree?

[pgaudet]

I cannot make a decision on an obsoletion without looking at the intended usage for the term. I have no time to look at 200 annotations.

[ValWood]

It just seems strange to use the term label "activity" in a label when it doesn't refer to the GO concept of "activity" (i.e molecular activity)

I thought this one would be a simple term relabelling , I didn't think we would need to check the annotations, but I guess it is possible that some of the direct annotations to the activity terms are not related to physical activity.

I can close this one....I only opened because I was confused by the term