Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obsoletion request: GO:0044845 chain elongation of O-linked mannose residue #28210

Open
1 of 12 tasks
ValWood opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 10 comments
Open
1 of 12 tasks

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Jun 19, 2024

Please provide as much information as you can:

  • GO term ID and Label

GO:0044845 chain elongation of O-linked mannose residue

  • Reason for deprecation Put an x in the appropriate box:
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term represents a molecular function.
  • "Replace by" term (ID and label)
    If all annotations can safely be moved to that term

  • "Consider" term(s) (ID and label)
    Suggestions for reannotation

  • Are there annotations to this term?

  • How many EXP:

2 PomBase EXP, removing today

  • Are there mappings and cross references to this term? (InterPro, Keywords; check QuickGO cross-references section)

  • Is this term in a subset? (check the AmiGO page for that term)

  • Any other information


Checklist for ontology editor

Check term usage and metadata in Protégé

  • check term usage in the ontology
  • check internal mappings: RHEA, EC, MetaCyc
  • check subset usage
  • check taxon constraints

Check annotations

Notification

@ValWood ValWood self-assigned this Jun 19, 2024
@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jun 20, 2024

There are other siblings:

GO:0035269    protein O-linked mannosylation | is_a
GO:0018406    protein C-linked glycosylation via 2'-alpha-mannosyl-L-tryptophan

I think these should also be obsoleted?

Also, can you suggest which MF the terms correspond to?

Thanks!

Pascale

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 20, 2024

I don't think there is a direct mapping for these, they are only describing the type of linakge.

For GO:0035269 protein O-linked mannosylation
they can be GPI anchor biosynthetic process (pombe dpm1,2,3,4 )

or ogm2,4 omh3
call wall mannoprotein biosynthetic process

and I think some could be
GO:0006488 | dolichol-linked oligosaccharide biosynthetic process
although I only have these with MF mannosyltransferases

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 20, 2024

I realise you asked about MF. These are multiple.

dolichyl-phosphate-mannose-protein mannosyltransferase activity
dolichyl-phosphate beta-D-mannosyltransferase activity
alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase activity
enzyme regulator activity

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 24, 2024

@pgaudet should I still go ahead with these obsoletions. I can't suggest precise replacements, but I can suggest that
MF & BP are reviewed.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jul 12, 2024

@pgaudet let me know if I can go ahead with this one.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jul 12, 2024

Hi Val,

How do you plan for the glycosylation branch to be re-organized? I have a hard time making comments if we obsolete some terms, in isolation from the rest of the branch.

Do you want to merge all into GO:0006486 protein glycosylation ?

We could discuss this on Monday's ontology call.

Thanks, Pascale

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jul 12, 2024

Yes I now think that most of the branch can go. I have been holding off because I am not sure about the
N-linked, O-linked etc.

So far I have only done the N-linked GO:0006488 dolichol-linked oligosaccharide biosynthetic process
so I noted any terms that were clearly MF terms during that work

Lets discuss this one on Monday

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jul 12, 2024

It would be clearer and possibly more efficient if you did a large tickets with all the terms that should be obsoleted, so we have a better idea of the work involved.

Thanks, Pascale

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jul 18, 2024

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jul 18, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants