-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obsoletion request: GO:0044845 chain elongation of O-linked mannose residue #28210
Comments
There are other siblings: GO:0035269 protein O-linked mannosylation | is_a I think these should also be obsoleted? Also, can you suggest which MF the terms correspond to? Thanks! Pascale |
I don't think there is a direct mapping for these, they are only describing the type of linakge. For GO:0035269 protein O-linked mannosylation or ogm2,4 omh3 and I think some could be |
I realise you asked about MF. These are multiple. dolichyl-phosphate-mannose-protein mannosyltransferase activity |
@pgaudet should I still go ahead with these obsoletions. I can't suggest precise replacements, but I can suggest that |
@pgaudet let me know if I can go ahead with this one. |
Hi Val, How do you plan for the glycosylation branch to be re-organized? I have a hard time making comments if we obsolete some terms, in isolation from the rest of the branch. Do you want to merge all into GO:0006486 protein glycosylation ? We could discuss this on Monday's ontology call. Thanks, Pascale |
Yes I now think that most of the branch can go. I have been holding off because I am not sure about the So far I have only done the N-linked GO:0006488 dolichol-linked oligosaccharide biosynthetic process Lets discuss this one on Monday |
It would be clearer and possibly more efficient if you did a large tickets with all the terms that should be obsoleted, so we have a better idea of the work involved. Thanks, Pascale |
Please provide as much information as you can:
GO:0044845 chain elongation of O-linked mannose residue
"Replace by" term (ID and label)
If all annotations can safely be moved to that term
"Consider" term(s) (ID and label)
Suggestions for reannotation
Are there annotations to this term?
2 PomBase EXP, removing today
Are there mappings and cross references to this term? (InterPro, Keywords; check QuickGO cross-references section)
Is this term in a subset? (check the AmiGO page for that term)
Any other information
Checklist for ontology editor
Check term usage and metadata in Protégé
Check annotations
Notification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: