-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dead definition cross references - Drosophila terms #27840
Comments
We should use the relevant anatomy ontology (Uberon or FBbt depending on range, not FBcv) as reference for trivial development compositional terms, but we should pay attention to species-specificity. E.g.
This is one of these GO terms that are a bit confused about their taxonomic scope. I'm guessing it was originally added for fly annotation and progressively generalized. It's currently used for mammalian genes, so it's not appropriate to have two drosophila specific references for such a broad fuzzy term. |
Hi @hattrill
Can you provide PMIDs (or other sources) for the following fly terms? These links are dead.
Thanks, Pascale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: