You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have examples of proteins that bind the cis-regulatory chromatin regions but do not have DNA sequence-specific binding activities. Obvious ones are transcription coregulators, but there are also kinases such as MTOR (see PMID:20233713).
We used to have parents of terms such as 'RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding' that omitted the 'sequence-specific' aspect, but we still children of DNA binding. So, we propose to create terms that would be children of 'chromatin binding':
RNA polymerase I cis-regulatory chromatin region binding
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory chromatin region binding
RNA polymerase III cis-regulatory chromatin region binding (PMID:20233713)
This will indicate recuitement to the cis-regulatory region by other factors, and hence indirect binding, but presence in the I/II/III promoters/enhancers.
Thanks, Pascale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
We have examples of proteins that bind the cis-regulatory chromatin regions but do not have DNA sequence-specific binding activities. Obvious ones are transcription coregulators, but there are also kinases such as MTOR (see PMID:20233713).
We used to have parents of terms such as 'RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding' that omitted the 'sequence-specific' aspect, but we still children of DNA binding. So, we propose to create terms that would be children of 'chromatin binding':
This will indicate recuitement to the cis-regulatory region by other factors, and hence indirect binding, but presence in the I/II/III promoters/enhancers.
Thanks, Pascale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: