Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cellular response to bacterium #13426

Open
slaulederkind opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

cellular response to bacterium #13426

slaulederkind opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@slaulederkind
Copy link

I would like to see “cellular response to bacterium” added to GO under the parent term “response to bacterium” (GO:0009617). The definition could be something like “Any process that results in a change in state or activity of a cell (in terms of movement, secretion, enzyme production, gene expression, etc.) as a result of a stimulus from a bacterium.” Example: PMID:28259042

@vanaukenk
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @slaulederkind

There are some existing terms about cellular responses to specific bacterial molecules, so here is a proposal for where I think this new term might fit:

GO:0009617 response to bacterium
-GO:NEW cellular response to bacterium
--GO:0071219 cellular response to molecule of bacterial origin
---GO:0071220 cellular response to bacterial lipoprotein
---GO:0071222 cellular response to lipopolysaccharide
---GO:0071223 cellular response to lipoteichoic acid
---GO:0071224 cellular response to peptidoglycan

See: https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0071219

@ukemi - given #12849 are we okay with adding a new cellular-level response term?

@ukemi
Copy link
Contributor

ukemi commented Apr 27, 2017

I think we might want to hold off on the new cellular level-term until after the GOC meeting.

@slaulederkind
Copy link
Author

Waiting until after the meeting is fine.

@vanaukenk
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, thank you both.
I've added GOC meeting and pending labels so we don't lose track of this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants