-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tpv: cotranslational protein targeting to membrane #11908
Comments
Maybe two different processes should be distinguished here - ones where the protein remains in the membrane ("targeting TO") and ones where the protein traverses the membrane ("targeting THROUGH"). The logic sounds OK; the amount of legacy cleanup work sounds horrible. Or change the definition to explicitly allow both "to" and "through" and re-do the parentage? And proteins destined to remain in the membrane get an additional annotation to "membrane organization"? Original comment by: deustp01 |
Original comment by: tberardini |
Reviewing this thread, I agree with Peter. The definition can be interpreted as 'THROUGH' even though the term name states 'TO the membrane.' (Def:The targeting of proteins to a membrane that occurs during translation. The transport of most secretory proteins, particularly those with more than 100 amino acids, into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen occurs in this manner, as does the import of some proteins into mitochondria. ) We need to clean this up. My suggestion:
to "The transport of most secretory proteins, particularly those with more than 100 amino acids, into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen BEGINS in this manner, as does the import of some proteins into mitochondria." Note that 'SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane' is transitively part of 'protein localization to ER'. This is consistent with the proposed text change. I think these changes will address the problem. Original comment by: tberardini |
Hi Val, |
Right now, on a Friday afternoon, your solution sounds pretty good. I'll revisit on Monday. Would we then be updating all the other similarly named terms like this: SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane to SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to ER |
It might require some more thought... Does targeting end when the SRP docks with the SRP receptor? (i.e recognition and docking) This might help if the SRP is also responsible for the decision to retain in the membrane or end up in the lumen. I haven't been able to find any info on specific cargo, but some images show both destinations. There are other (SRP-independent) mechanisms to get into the ER and I'm unsure if cargo of different import mechanisms have different final destinations (i.e. ER lumen, OR integral, extrinsic, intrinsic or anchored to membrane. This is the 'translocation' def...this seems to be 'post targeting'? The SRP and its receptor have a role in 'initiating' this process but this could be considered independent of the targeting role (or maybe it would more correctly be enabled_by rather than a part_of role?) |
see also See also #13758 |
cotranslational protein targeting to membrane
http:https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GTerm?id=GO:0006613#term=ancchart
ends up as "membrane organization" via
GO:0072657 protein localization to membrane
However, cotranslational protein targeting to membrane is not always 'membrane organization'
(for example if transported into the ER lumen)
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/11747
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: