-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing PR (Protein Ontology) axiomatization #11809
Comments
List of terms to axiomatize:
|
pgaudet
changed the title
Missing PR axiomatization
Missing PR (Protein Ontology) axiomatization
Jan 18, 2023
From @hdrabkin Standard PRO definitions are something like "A protein that this the translation product of human xx or a human ortholog thereof" -- what does that mean if there is a 1-n ortholog relation? Would we need to check to check on the orthology before creating a LD ? @cmungall Do we want to do this ? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It seems there are various cases where we have a GO synonym derived from PR, but not equivalence axiom in GO. Many of these are candidates for missing logical defs, see attachment.
Columns:
Example: FasL biosynthetic process should have axiom saying equiv to biosynthesis and has_output some PR:FasL
Reported by: cmungall
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/11645
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: