Add method to notify CodePush update into RN internal interface.

[lucaslabari]

Goal

• From RN side we have a way to know if CodePush has recently updated the bundle.
• In this PR I added a method to differentiate CodePush from other OTAs.
• If a customer is using CodePush, RN SDK will call setJavaScriptBundleUrlForCodePush passing also a boolean indicating if this is the first run for that bundle and we need to update the bundleId.
• If a customer is using other OTA like Expo, RN SDK will call setJavaScriptBundleUrl and the bundleId will need to be calculated each time this method is called with a new bundleUrl, because if it's the same as the persisted one, the bundleId was calculated at startup.
• At startup, we calculate the bundleId if it's not persisted and if the bundleURL is not persisted either, we use buildInfo.buildId as the default value.

Testing

Added unit tests.

Release Notes

• Optimized Bundle Id calculation for RN Apps using CodePush.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.49%. Comparing base (f31bbb3) to head (d74b3aa).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #496      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.54%   79.49%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         379      380       +1     
  Lines       10288    10300      +12     
  Branches     1507     1509       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         8184     8188       +4     
- Misses       1513     1517       +4     
- Partials      591      595       +4     

Files	Coverage Δ
...oid/embracesdk/capture/metadata/MetadataService.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...roid/embracesdk/prefs/EmbracePreferencesService.kt	93.42% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
...ace/android/embracesdk/prefs/PreferencesService.kt	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...oid/embracesdk/ReactNativeInternalInterfaceImpl.kt	62.22% <90.00%> (+0.31%)	⬆️
...racesdk/capture/metadata/EmbraceMetadataService.kt	87.88% <83.33%> (-0.37%)	⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[fnewberg]

@lucaslabari what is the reason we are making this change? was the old approach causing ANRs?

[lucaslabari]

@lucaslabari what is the reason we are making this change? was the old approach causing ANRs?

The ANRs were solved in another PR. The goal of this PR is to optimize the calculation of the RN bundleId that is sometimes a heavy operation. We are not blocking the main thread anymore, but if we calculate the bundleId each time and the bundle is a heavy file, then the early events could go to the backend with a null value for the bundleId in the payload. So the idea is to minimize this given that we have a way to know if CodePush updated the bundle.

[bidetofevil]

A couple of tweak suggestions but looks good overall