[DOCS][ESQL] Add object type to unsupported field types list #109970
Conversation
|
Documentation preview: |
|
Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs) |
|
Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics) |
| @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ include::processing-commands/limit.asciidoc[tag=limitation] | |||
| ** `ip_range` | |||
| ** `long_range` | |||
| ** `nested` | |||
| ** `object` | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The story here is complicated. Like, what does "support" mean here. We load fields in an object field just fine. But we don't support loading the entire object field as a tree structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right maybe add some more color and move it somewhere else in limitations page? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess move it.... I think it'd look funky to have a bunch of nuance in this list. Especially around the other fields where the answer is pretty simple - we just can't touch these fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I guess the question is what weirdnesses are folks going to hit if they try to work with object fields in ES|QL, and are they worth enumerating here at this point in time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's worth double checking. They don't come back in *. If you refer to them directly they are unsupported, but I don't know what that'll look like. But that's not a "normal" thing to do.
|
Let's park this and see if it becomes a recurring question, rather than writing a load of caveat-filled verbiage |
No description provided.