-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Source for music is missing, or music is incorrectly licensed #291
Comments
@Zefz and @penguinflyer5234 please join the conversation. I do not switch licenses based on a "should" without carefully evaluating the consequences. However, this has no priority to me at the moment. From the technical side: If we receive assets in more suitable formats, then those files will be certainly committed to the assets repository. |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:08:02AM -0700, Michael Heilmann wrote:
I don't think it matters whether you are using PNG vs BMP or FLAC vs WAV. I'd say even OGG is fine for sound effects; you can easily load those in a sound editor and work with them. Similarly, JPEG with a very high quality might also be fine. The GPL says nothing about bit-for-bit reproducability. The issue is that the GPL says that the preferred form of modification of the works must be available. If you want to modify a texture or a sound effect, you just load the them in any image or sound editor. Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, |
It makes sense to make assets the more permissive CC-BY-SA 3.0 and keep the source code at GPL if this resolves some licensing issues with Linux packages. The aim of the liscense is not to restrict useage but rather promote creative use and distribution. |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:47:41PM -0700, JohanJansen wrote:
That would help. It also is not specific to Linux; this affects packages Many songs are apparently made by Adam Frechette. Make sure you actually Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, |
There was an interesting discussion in the old forum; this seems to be a long standing issue. So far, we have three names:
|
Egoboo has a single license file stating that it is GPL-3.0. Even the egoboo-assets repository contains a license.txt file saying everything is GPL-3.0. However, the GPL version 3.0 is quite specific: the source (the preferred form of modification) should be available, not just of computer programs, but of any copyrightable work. For music, the preferred form of modification is not the final .ogg file, rather it is the music score, sample set and perhaps other data that was involved in rendering the music.
Either you should add the source files that were used to create the music, or change the license of the music to something that fits the situation better, like CC-BY-SA 3.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: