Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please Reopen #299 #1121

Closed
claus007 opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Please Reopen #299 #1121

claus007 opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@claus007
Copy link

The issue I am talking about is is:
log timestamp in readable format instead of seconds #299

This is ridiculus -this is the only program I know which is not able to produce a correct timestamp.
So please reopen it and focus the problem.

If you take a closer look at the original item you will find out, that this bothers still a lot of people - including me ;-)

Thanks in advance!

@sprior
Copy link

sprior commented Jan 29, 2019

I'd also like to see a readable timestamp in the log.

@mjoshd
Copy link

mjoshd commented Feb 6, 2019

+1 for human-readable timestamps please! 😄

@Escalion
Copy link

@ralight +1 for human-readable timestamps

@lyolic
Copy link

lyolic commented Mar 8, 2019

+1 for human-readable timestamps

@ZhuDaHai
Copy link

ZhuDaHai commented Mar 12, 2019

+1 for human-readable timestamps
Even just running the yearmonthdayhoursminutesseconds together would work for me and only require 4 more bytes of storage. Then at least I'd have some idea when it happened. Local timezone conversion would be preferred, but I'd settle for UTC:
1552346689
20190311232449

ralight added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2019
ralight added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2019
@claus007
Copy link
Author

Cool thing - thanks a lot (BOW)!

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 7, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants