-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
init object pool #940
init object pool #940
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #940 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.37% 72.91% -0.46%
==========================================
Files 133 134 +1
Lines 14760 14866 +106
==========================================
+ Hits 10830 10840 +10
- Misses 3307 3400 +93
- Partials 623 626 +3
... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
keep which one objectpool or both |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please keep the lock-free version.
…e new pool func name
* init object pool * fix by bot adv * fid and clean code * cas * fix: 1.remove pool base on sync.Mutex;2.expose fields of Spec;3.rename new pool func name * use sync.Cond instead of spinlock * remove unnecessary cond.Lock * reactor code * fix compile bug
No description provided.