Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix random failure of jmx test cases #290

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2021
Merged

fix random failure of jmx test cases #290

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2021

Conversation

localvar
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

@megaeasex megaeasex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[TASK:easegress-pr-test SUCCESS]megaease/easegress Pull Request 290 Deploy Test Success

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #290 (5016730) into main (f025028) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #290   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.18%   80.18%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        4865     4865           
=======================================
  Hits         3901     3901           
  Misses        742      742           
  Partials      222      222           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f025028...5016730. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@haoel haoel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@haoel haoel merged commit bf95a21 into easegress-io:main Oct 9, 2021
@localvar localvar deleted the fix-jmx-cases branch October 9, 2021 02:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants