Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some missed operations of Mesh #288

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2021
Merged

Conversation

xxx7xxxx
Copy link
Contributor

Enhancement stuff in preparation of demo

Copy link

@megaeasex megaeasex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[TASK:easegress-pr-test SUCCESS]megaease/easegress Pull Request 288 Deploy Test Success

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #288 (7b50b04) into main (fe3a450) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #288   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.18%   80.18%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        4865     4865           
=======================================
  Hits         3901     3901           
  Misses        742      742           
  Partials      222      222           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/object/meshcontroller/spec/spec.go 89.51% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fe3a450...7b50b04. Read the comment docs.

Comment on lines +195 to +197
IngressPort: 13001,
IngressProtocol: "http",
EgressPort: 13002,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IngressPort & EgressPort are hardcoded to 13001 & 13002, just to confirm this is desired.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are external services, so I think we should assign an default IngressPort and EgressPort for them, for keeping other parts going well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines +195 to +197
IngressPort: 13001,
IngressProtocol: "http",
EgressPort: 13002,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are external services, so I think we should assign an default IngressPort and EgressPort for them, for keeping other parts going well.

@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ func (rcs *Server) DiscoveryService(serviceName string) (*ServiceRegistryInfo, e
return serviceInfo, err
}

// FIXME: rcs.tenant won't change after updating
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This problem had been fixed in PR #287

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eliminated

Copy link
Contributor

@benja-wu benja-wu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@megaeasex megaeasex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[TASK:easegress-pr-test SUCCESS]megaease/easegress Pull Request 288 Deploy Test Success

@localvar localvar merged commit 542eaeb into easegress-io:main Oct 9, 2021
@xxx7xxxx xxx7xxxx deleted the mesh branch October 10, 2021 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants