STI support

[ultimatenexus]

Any plans on integrating STI support?

Currently, I have to define my indexed fields in each subclass. Defining the indexed fields in the base class results in undefined behavior during initial index construction (on the fly updates seam to work though...).

Not a big problem in my case, as I am not searching in the base class anyway, but in other cases this might be desirable.

[dougal]

Hi.

This is possibly trivial to implement, I shall look into it.

Thanks.

On Thursday, 19 September 2013 at 12:28, ultimatenexus wrote:

Any plans on integrating STI support?
Currently, I have to define my indexed fields in each subclass. Defining the indexed fields in the base class results in undefined behavior during initial index construction (on the fly updates seam to work though...).
Not a big problem in my case, as I am not searching in the base class anyway, but in other cases this might be desirable.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#50).