Update license's copyright #2989
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Afaik end year is not required, starting year should be enough. Copyrights do expire though, but who would use current code in 50 years or so? Also see https://twitter.com/wouterjnl/status/947514046009536512. |
|
I just dropped it from my codebases, but not because I know better, just because I stopped caring about it, since the licence of my packages is extremely permissive anyway. |
|
Please also remember that we DO sign our releases and we DO have a provable git history to claim anything related to copyrights, if ever needed. |
|
Meanwhile, merging this. Thanks @SenseException! |
|
If that's the case, I would have preferred to remove the end year, so there would be no need to update the |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
License file is sufficient (#2853) but outdated. Is an end year even needed for MIT?