Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support authority info access x509 v3 section creation through extensions #775

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SevanMelemedjian
Copy link

This feature would allow forge users to specify the Authority Info Access section as described by the OpenSSL organization in their x509 v3 manual page.

The user could create a list of access descriptions for either OCSP servers or CA Issuers by adding an entry looking like this in the extensions array:

  {
    name: 'authorityInfoAccess',
    accessDescriptions: [
      {
        accessMethod: 'ocsp',
        accessLocation: 'http:https://ocsp.example.com'
      },
      {
        accessMethod: 'caIssuers',
        accessLocation: 'http:https://authority.example.com/servicesca.der'
      }
    ]
  }

@SevanMelemedjian SevanMelemedjian changed the title Support authority info access x509 v3 section creation though extensions Support authority info access x509 v3 section creation through extensions Apr 12, 2020
@x-077
Copy link

x-077 commented May 9, 2020

great feature.Thanks @SevanMelemedjian . I can not wait to use it :)

@x-077
Copy link

x-077 commented Jul 8, 2020

Hello @davidlehn , any chance to get this merge ?

Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor

@dhensby dhensby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would be super helpful and is low risk change.

@davidlehn davidlehn added this to the v1.x milestone Jan 7, 2022
TimAEllis added a commit to TimAEllis/forge that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
Taken from the main repo's PR digitalbazaar#775
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants