Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: move jupyter esm out of main snapshot #21163

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

littledivy
Copy link
Member

Towards #21136

@littledivy littledivy changed the title perf: move jupyter esm out of main snapsnot perf: move jupyter esm out of main snapshot Nov 11, 2023
@littledivy
Copy link
Member Author

const format = Deno[Deno.internal].jupyter.formatInner;

Some unit tests depend on the jupyter internals object to be available during deno test. cc @bartlomieju

@bartlomieju
Copy link
Member

const format = Deno[Deno.internal].jupyter.formatInner;

Some unit tests depend on the jupyter internals object to be available during deno test. cc @bartlomieju

Hmpf, I forgot about that... Is there some internal flag we have that we could use to execute this file in internal unit tests? If not maybe we can add one?

cli/worker.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@littledivy littledivy enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2023 16:41
Copy link
Member

@bartlomieju bartlomieju left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@littledivy littledivy merged commit ab0c637 into denoland:main Nov 14, 2023
13 checks passed
@bartlomieju bartlomieju deleted the jupyter_esm_out_of_snapshot branch November 14, 2023 21:06
kt3k pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
zifeo pushed a commit to metatypedev/deno that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants