Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Live Trains] Short platforms #226

Open
davwheat opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 36 comments
Open

[Live Trains] Short platforms #226

davwheat opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 36 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@davwheat
Copy link
Owner

davwheat commented Jun 2, 2024

Hello!

Thanks for wanting to give feedback about short platform announcements for Live Trains. I really appreciate your help! :)

As a reminder, at this time we are only interested in short platform information for Govia Thameslink Railway and Southeastern served stations. There will be a future opportunity to expand this feature, but we want to make sure it's working well before rolling it out to the entire network.

It'd really help if your feedback follows a consistent structure to make resolving issues quicker and simpler.

Hit the copy button below and paste it into the textbox at the bottom of the page to get started.

<!-- Delete as appropriate -->
**Issue type:** Missing short platform / Wrong short platform information / Other

<!-- Please write the station name *and* station CRS code below -->
**Station affected:** 

<!-- List the TOCs affected by your issue -->
**TOC(s) affected:**

<!-- Explain the problem in detail. For example, if the info is correct for some rolling stock but not others, this is an important detail to mention. -->
**Detailed info:**

Example:

<!-- Delete as appropriate -->
**Issue type:** Missing short platform

<!-- Please write the station name *and* station CRS code below -->
**Station affected:** Balcombe (BAB)

<!-- List the TOCs affected by your issue -->
**TOC(s) affected:** Southern, Thameslink

<!-- Explain the problem in detail. For example,
if the info is correct for some rolling stock but
not others, this is an important detail to mention. -->
**Detailed info:**

Platform 2 is a short platform. Both Southern and
Thameslink only open doors on the front 8 coaches
at this station on all of their rolling stock.

375 SDO Database Extract.xlsx

@davwheat

This comment was marked as resolved.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as outdated.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as outdated.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as resolved.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as outdated.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as resolved.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as resolved.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as outdated.

@GTRspotter

This comment was marked as outdated.

davwheat added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2024
@davwheat

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@JMP1975

This comment was marked as resolved.

@JMP1975

This comment was marked as resolved.

Repository owner deleted a comment from JMP1975 Jun 16, 2024
@davwheat

This comment was marked as resolved.

davwheat added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2024
@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

davwheat added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2024
@EWSTrains

This comment was marked as resolved.

@EWSTrains

This comment was marked as outdated.

@davwheat
Copy link
Owner Author

davwheat commented Jun 16, 2024

Issue type: Missing short platform information

Station affected: Norwood Junction

TOC(s) affected: Thameslink and Southern

Detailed info:

Norwood Junction - Front 10 coaches

Already implemented for Southern:

NWD: {
'1': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.10'),
},
'2': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.10'),
},
'3': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.10'),
},
'4': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.10'),
},
'5': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.10'),
},
'6': {
SN: southernTurboElectro('front.7', 'front.9'),
},
'*': {
SE: 'front.8',
},
},

Issue type: Wrong short platform information allocated

Station affected: Dover Priory

TOC(s) affected: Southeastern

Detailed info:

Dover Priory front 10 not front 8 as announced

@EWSTrains This depends on the rolling stock and the platform.

image

The sectional appendix states that platform 3 only fits 8 coaches and 2 will fit 10 coaches.

Class 375s open the same number of doors at every platform of every station by default, so 8 coaches would be correct for these units no matter which platform they use.

I appreciate that the data for Class 395s is, however, incorrect.

@EWSTrains
Copy link

I know Dover has front 8 on 375 as the system cant manage several short platforms hence Westenhanger being short both ways with the Dover platform able to take 8

I know alot about Dover Deal lines as im local to the line and my dad worked at Dover

Im gaining the Short Platform info from Tiger which then operates the Short Platform info for Anne

@davwheat
Copy link
Owner Author

I've sent an FOI to Southeastern for their info.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

@faberoony90

This comment was marked as resolved.

davwheat added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2024
@callumowen

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@davwheat

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@davwheat
Copy link
Owner Author

davwheat commented Jul 7, 2024

I've sent an FOI to Southeastern for their info.

Apparently the short platform info is the same for all rolling stock.

@samulcamel

This comment was marked as resolved.

@davwheat

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants