-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Licence for whatdotheyknow data #12
Comments
Good suggestion. I looked into this as well and chatted with @pudo. I would also like to add direct credits back to relevant urls but have not got that yet (all i had in the csv originally was a link to api which is not that useful). I think one could make a good argument here for being out of any DB rights given size of DB etc but it would be very nice to be clear. I also note gov.uk has a nice list and statistics.data.gov.uk had a good list of local councils and the like. |
DB rights might not apply for a dozen rows, but WDTK is 5000 - surely that is covered. There are also lists here: http:https://openlylocal.com/ and reference.data.gov.uk. I think basically we need some Refine work to consolidate these, and not just once, but be able to repeat it in the future. I'm having a think about a tool to do this. |
<sales_mode> nomenklatura? </sales_mode> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:21 PM, David Read [email protected]:
|
Has the licence for the whatdotheyknow list of public bodies been established? We asked a few months ago and they didn't have one, although no doubt with a good nudge they would be happy to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: