Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Unicode strings and characters #13
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RFC: Unicode strings and characters #13
Changes from 1 commit
f64cd44
098ccbd
efc0ba8
2c5ae54
1c9ecda
9a636ed
5f7d0e0
d347572
16f6a97
04d2553
931d679
3b87491
30c7ea7
cbb491e
560f395
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is better but still ambiguous. Maybe it's enough to say that strings literals are as in Dafny 3, except for the fact that unpaired surrogates are disallowed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's only true w.r.t. what literals are permitted in source text though (with the added
\U{X..X}
escape sequence), not how they are represented at runtime. I do want to say that, unlike in Dafny 3, users shouldn't assume a string literal becomes a sequence where every ASCII character or\u
escape sequence literally becomes an individual element of that sequence. I want to call out that if you compile your program to Go, for example, your literal will likely become a Gostring
value wrapped as aDafny.Sequence<rune>
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again I'm hoping that dropping support for
\u
makes this clearer.